2010 City 2 Surf Official Magazine
Articles, UC QuakeStudies
A PDF copy of the official magazine for the 2010 City 2 Surf event.
A PDF copy of the official magazine for the 2010 City 2 Surf event.
A PDF copy of the official magazine for the 2011 City 2 Surf event.
An earthquake memories story from Paul Schoolderman, Health Protection Officer, Community and Public Health, titled, "Surfing on asphalt".
A PDF copy of fourteen signs produced for City2Surf 2015. The images and messages on the signs are from phase 3 of the All Right? campaign and feature unique compliments such as "You're more fun than a barrel of monkeys" and "Your love is better than coffee!".
A PDF copy of four cut-out signs produced for City2Surf 2015. The images and messages on the signs ask questions relating to the Five Ways to Wellbeing, such as "When did you last get your sweat on?" and "Been outside with the whanau lately?".
The front page layout for the Summer Press section of the Press, featuring an essay about a love affair with the Canterbury landscape.
The damaged Sumner Surf Lifesaving Club building. The rear of the building has been demolished, and spray-painted notices on the walls read "No entry, not safe" and "No parking, not safe".
A PDF copy of signs used along the 2014 Summer Starter course. Each sign includes information about one of the major charities involved, as well as the logos of major and supporting partners.
This paper presents an examination of ground motion observations from 20 near-source strong motion stations during the most significant 10 events in the 2010-2011 Canterbury earthquake to examine region-specific systematic effects based on relaxing the conventional ergodic assumption. On the basis of similar site-to-site residuals, surfical geology, and geographical proximity, 15 of the 20 stations are grouped into four sub-regions: the Central Business District; and Western, Eastern, and Northern suburbs. Mean site-to-site residuals for these sub-regions then allows for the possibility of non-ergodic ground motion prediction over these sub-regions of Canterbury, rather than only at strong motion station locations. The ratio of the total non-ergodic vs. ergodic standard deviation is found to be, on average, consistent with previous studies, however it is emphasized that on a site-by-site basis the non-ergodic standard deviation can easily vary by ±20%.