Implementing seismic risk mitigation is a major challenge in many earthquake prone regions. The objective of this research is to investigate how property investment market practices can be used to enhance building owners’ decisions to improve seismic performance of earthquake prone buildings (EPBs). A case study method adopted, revealed the impacts of the property market stakeholders’ practices on seismic retrofit decisions. The findings from this research provide significant new insights on how property market-based incentives such as such as mandatory disclosure of seismic risks in all transactions in the property market, effective awareness seismic risk program and a unified earthquake safety assessment information system, can be used to enhance EPBs owners seismic retrofit decisions. These market-based incentives offer compelling reasons for the different property market stakeholders and the public at large to retain, care, invest, and act responsibly to rehabilitate EPBs. The findings suggest need for stakeholders involved in property investment and retrofit decisions to work together to foster seismic rehabilitation of EPBs.
Commercial property owners are facing not just higher insurance premiums following the Christchurch earthquakes, but also the prospect of much higher excesses.
Page 5 of a Lifestyle Properties advertising feature in the Christchurch Press, published on Friday 8 April 2011.
Page 1 of a Lifestyle Properties advertising feature in the Christchurch Press, published on Friday 23 September 2011.
Page 6 of a Lifestyle Properties advertising feature in the Christchurch Press, published on Friday 23 September 2011.
Page 5 of a Lifestyle Properties advertising feature in the Christchurch Press, published on Friday 23 September 2011.
Page 11 of a Lifestyle Properties advertising feature in the Christchurch Press, published on Friday 23 September 2011.
Page 9 of a Lifestyle Properties advertising feature in the Christchurch Press, published on Friday 23 September 2011.
Page 4 of a Lifestyle Properties advertising feature in the Christchurch Press, published on Friday 23 September 2011.
Page 7 of a Lifestyle Properties advertising feature in the Christchurch Press, published on Friday 23 September 2011.
Page 12 of a Lifestyle Properties advertising feature in the Christchurch Press, published on Friday 23 September 2011.
Page 6 of a Lifestyle Properties advertising feature in the Christchurch Press, published on Friday 8 April 2011.
Page 4 of a Lifestyle Properties advertising feature in the Christchurch Press, published on Friday 8 April 2011.
Page 8 of a Lifestyle Properties advertising feature in the Christchurch Press, published on Friday 8 April 2011.
Page 9 of a Lifestyle Properties advertising feature in the Christchurch Press, published on Friday 8 April 2011.
Page 10 of a Lifestyle Properties advertising feature in the Christchurch Press, published on Friday 8 April 2011.
Page 11 of a Lifestyle Properties advertising feature in the Christchurch Press, published on Friday 8 April 2011.
Page 3 of a Lifestyle Properties advertising feature in the Christchurch Press, published on Friday 8 April 2011.
Page 1 of a Lifestyle Properties advertising feature in the Christchurch Press, published on Friday 8 April 2011.
Page 2 of a Lifestyle Properties advertising feature in the Christchurch Press, published on Friday 23 September 2011.
Page 8 of a Lifestyle Properties advertising feature in the Christchurch Press, published on Friday 23 September 2011.
Page 12 of a Lifestyle Properties advertising feature in the Christchurch Press, published on Friday 8 April 2011.
Page 3 of a Lifestyle Properties advertising feature in the Christchurch Press, published on Friday 23 September 2011.
Page 2 of a Lifestyle Properties advertising feature in the Christchurch Press, published on Friday 8 April 2011.
Page 7 of a Lifestyle Properties advertising feature in the Christchurch Press, published on Friday 8 April 2011.
Page 10 of a Lifestyle Properties advertising feature in the Christchurch Press, published on Friday 23 September 2011.
The Canterbury Earthquakes Royal Commission has heard the property manager of the Pyne Gould building did not organise detailed engineering assessments after the first quake in September.
Seven $750 a day - plus expenses. That's the sum being earned by more than 414 people employed by the Earthquake Commission to carry out property inspections in Christchurch.
A portaloo outside a property.
Fallen chimney on a residential property.