During the Christchurch earthquake of February 2011, several midrise buildings of Reinforced Concrete Masonry (RCM) construction achieved performance levels in the range of life safety to near collapse levels. These buildings were subjected to seismic demands higher than the building code requirements of the time and higher than the current New Zealand Loadings Standard (NZS-1170.5:2004). Structural damage to these buildings has been documented and is currently being studied to establish lessons to be learned from their performance and how to incorporate these lessons into future RCM design and construction practices. This paper presents a case study of a six story RCM building deemed to have reached the near collapse performance level. The RCM walls on the 2nd floor failed due to toe crushing reducing the building’s lateral resistance in the east-west direction. A nonlinear dynamic analysis on a 3D model was conducted to simulate the development of the governing failure mechanism. Preliminary analysis results show that the damaged walls were initially under large compression forces from gravity loads which caused increase in their lateral strength and reduced their ductility. After toe crushing failure developed, axial instability of the model was prevented by a redistribution of gravity loads.
Previous earthquakes demonstrated destructive effects of soil-structure interaction on structural response. For example, in the 1970 Gediz earthquake in Turkey, part of a factory was demolished in a town 135 km from the epicentre, while no other buildings in the town were damaged. Subsequent investigations revealed that the fundamental period of vibration of the factory was approximately equal to that of the underlying soil. This alignment provided a resonance effect and led to collapse of the structure. Another dramatic example took place in Adapazari, during the 1999 Kocaeli earthquake where several foundations failed due to either bearing capacity exceedance or foundation uplifting, consequently, damaging the structure. Finally, the Christchurch 2012 earthquakes have shown that significant nonlinear action in the soil and soil-foundation interface can be expected due to high levels of seismic excitation and spectral acceleration. This nonlinearity, in turn, significantly influenced the response of the structure interacting with the soil-foundation underneath. Extensive research over more than 35 years has focused on the subject of seismic soil-structure interaction. However, since the response of soil-structure systems to seismic forces is extremely complex, burdened by uncertainties in system parameters and variability in ground motions, the role of soil-structure interaction on the structural response is still controversial. Conventional design procedures suggest that soil-structure interaction effects on the structural response can be conservatively ignored. However, more recent studies show that soil-structure interaction can be either beneficial or detrimental, depending on the soil-structure-earthquake scenarios considered. In view of the above mentioned issues, this research aims to utilise a comprehensive and systematic probabilistic methodology, as the most rational way, to quantify the effects of soil-structure interaction on the structural response considering both aleatory and epistemic uncertainties. The goal is achieved by examining the response of established rheological single-degree-of-freedom systems located on shallow-foundation and excited by ground motions with different spectral characteristics. In this regard, four main phases are followed. First, the effects of seismic soil-structure interaction on the response of structures with linear behaviour are investigated using a robust stochastic approach. Herein, the soil-foundation interface is modelled by an equivalent linear cone model. This phase is mainly considered to examine the influence of soil-structure interaction on the approach that has been adopted in the building codes for developing design spectrum and defining the seismic forces acting on the structure. Second, the effects of structural nonlinearity on the role of soil-structure interaction in modifying seismic structural response are studied. The same stochastic approach as phase 1 is followed, while three different types of structural force-deflection behaviour are examined. Third, a systematic fashion is carried out to look for any possible correlation between soil, structural, and system parameters and the degree of soil-structure interaction effects on the structural response. An attempt is made to identify the key parameters whose variation significantly affects the structural response. In addition, it is tried to define the critical range of variation of parameters of consequent. Finally, the impact of soil-foundation interface nonlinearity on the soil-structure interaction analysis is examined. In this regard, a newly developed macro-element covering both material and geometrical soil-foundation interface nonlinearity is implemented in a finite-element program Raumoko 3D. This model is then used in an extensive probabilistic simulation to compare the effects of linear and nonlinear soil-structure interaction on the structural response. This research is concluded by reviewing the current design guidelines incorporating soil-structure interaction effects in their design procedures. A discussion is then followed on the inadequacies of current procedures based on the outcomes of this study.
Paper 3408The paper discusses modelling of cyclic stress-strain behaviour of soil, in particular a simple model that can produce a desired stiffness and hysteretic damping for a given strain level as observed in laboratory testing is formulated. The unloading-reloading relationship is developed for total stress seismic site response analysis with appropriate damping at large strain. The constitutive model employs a hyperbolic equation as the backbone curve, and uses a modification of the extended Masing unloading-reloading relationship leading to correct measured modulus reduction and damping curves simultaneously. A quasi-static cyclic loading of increasing amplitude is used to demonstrate the model’s performance and its capability to allow improved modelling of the magnitude of energy dissipation based on an experimental program on native sandy soils from Christchurch, New Zealand.
8-pagesDue to the extreme damage seen in several recent earthquakes, several passive energy dissipation devices have been developed with different mechanisms of energy dissipation. Response spectra analysis across multiple earthquake suites is used to investigate the reductions in structural response and base shear forces to probabilistically assess the impact of these devices using suites of ground motions from the SAC project. Single-degree-of-freedom spectral analysis structures are used with nonlinear models of the sliding hinge joint (SHJ) and HF2V devices. Reduction factors are computed for each device compared to a linear, no-device structure. Force capacity for SHJ and HF2V devices are equivalent. Results are presented as 5th, 25th, median (50th), 75th and 95th percentile responses at each period (0.1-5.0s by 0.1s increments). Both devices show significant reductions in displacement at all spectral periods of 30- 60% (at median). Both increase base shear forces. However, SHJ systems show both a broader 5-95th percentile range, as well as larger increases in base shear due to their different velocity dependence in dissipating energy. The results provide initial design trade-off information in a probabilistic, performance-based framework for these devices.
8-pagesViscous damping can be used to limit structural response due to seismic excitation. However, if large response velocities occur during an extreme seismic event such as a Maximum Considered Event (MCE), then significant damping forces can be created due to the damper velocity dependence. These damping forces are important as they must be resisted by the foundation, increasing design demand. Therefore, methods to predict and limit peak damping forces are important. To avoid the possibility of large foundation demands a yielding fuse can be used in series with the viscous damper to enable incorporation of large capacity viscous dampers to dissipate large amounts of energy during lower-level seismic events without inducing unacceptably high foundation demands during larger events. This paper delineates the impact of this approach in a probabilistic spectral design analysis using a suite of probabilistically scaled seismic events and a nonlinear model. Reduction factors versus a linear system with the same damper are calculated for base shear and displacement. A reduced sacrificial fuse yield force of 25% of the median base-shear force of the uncontrolled structure has only a small impact on displacement response, but can significantly reduce peak base-shear during extreme seismic events. The 95th percentile displacement reduction factors increase from 0.85 to 0.96 (small displacement reductions) but 95th percentile base-shear reduction factors decrease from 2.0 to 1.4, which is a significant reduction in peak foundation demand. This analysis clearly outlines the design tradeoffs and considerations for realistic structural design scenarios using added viscous damping.
