Under the framework of New Public Management, the government has decentralised the responsibility for Disaster Risk Management (DRM) to regional, local, and community levels in New Zealand. This decentralisation serves political agendas related to resource allocation and is supported by empirical evidence suggesting that involving communities in DRM during recovery decision-making enhances disaster resilience. Extensive evidence indicates that community participation in DRM, especially during recovery decision-making, can significantly improve recovery outcomes at the community level. However, there has been limited research into whether the legal framework in New Zealand effectively facilitates meaningful public engagement to empower the public in influencing disaster recovery decisions. To address this gap in the literature, this thesis aims to explore the extent to which legislative and governance arrangements transfer the responsibility, liability, and costs of managing disaster risks to local levels without enabling meaningful public contribution to and influence on recovery decisions affecting them. Situated within Public Law and Disaster Risk and Resilience disciplines and using a case study of Greater Christchurch, New Zealand, this interdisciplinary thesis examines both common law and statutory provisions in the legal framework impacting public engagement before and during recovery from the Canterbury Earthquake Sequence. In particular, this thesis assesses how legislative, and governance frameworks influenced communities’ ability to influence recovery decision-making following the 2010-2011 Canterbury Earthquake Sequence (CES). This thesis shows that before the CES, the New Zealand public engagement system closely adhered to the common law principle of the ‘duty to consult’, which remains the current legal standard. This principle required decision-makers to use the 'public notice and comment' approach as a minimum, limiting meaningful community participation in decision-making. After the earthquakes, reliance on this traditional approach caused growing frustration and division locally, as the public struggled to effectively engage in and influence recovery decisions, resulting in new community activism. The Canterbury Earthquake Recovery Act (CER Act), introduced following the Christchurch Earthquake, included innovative provisions on public engagement. However, for various reasons, this Act appeared to have minimal impact on meaningful public engagement in recovery decision-making, which continued to align with the broader, existing public engagement system and associated norms. The empirical findings indicate that despite the novel legislative language, the traditional public engagement framework in New Zealand constrained effective engagement, leading to a broader erosion of trust between the public and the government. This was largely attributed to the default ‘public notice and comment’ approach at the local government level, with inadequate mechanisms for community engagement in central government decision-making shaping the expectations of recovery decision-makers still operating within this framework. Notable departures from this traditional approach were evident in the practices of the Waimakariri District Council and Christchurch City Council. Particularly noteworthy was the ‘Share an Idea’ public engagement campaign. Unlike conventional processes, it did not commence with a near-final or draft document. Instead, it utilised participatory mechanisms that fostered meaningful dialogue, enabling the public to significantly shape the content of the draft Christchurch Central Recovery Plan. The initial success of such participatory engagement underscores its potential effectiveness throughout the entire recovery planning process, an option that was not exercised by the central government. In conclusion, this thesis argues that New Zealand should move beyond the entrenched ‘public notice and comment’ approach and adopt more open and inclusive public participation mechanisms. It contends that supplementing this approach with proactive participatory methods before disasters could yield favorable outcomes during disaster recovery, thereby ensuring meaningful public involvement in future decisions that affect communities.
The foundation of this thesis rests upon previous research conducted as part of a QuakeCoRE summer scholarship project which investigated the health and safety regulations for utility workers within Aotearoa and in relation to the Canterbury Earthquake Sequence (CES). This project highlighted that the primary Health and Safety at Work Act 2015 was not directly applicable to these workers, given the unique set of risks and dangers. Additionally, the same research found that, in the absence of adequate intervention mechanisms, there is a reliance on internal health and safety procedures and standards, which may be compromised in an emergency scenario. A key element of Aotearoa’s disaster response framework regarding utility workers is the use of emergency powers, whereby the Director of Civil Defence Emergency Management may order utility workers, by proxy, to undertake any order during a state of national emergency or a national transition period.4 This power appears to be unrestrained and creates tension in relation to human rights and worker’s rights. The endangerment of utility workers in a disaster scenario is a global issue, with extensive research suggesting the involvement of utility workers within the immediate aftermath of disasters across many jurisdictions.5 This thesis investigates the involvement of utility workers in emergencies in two different jurisdictions, alongside the legal and non-legal protective measures taken within these jurisdictions to safeguard their mental and physical health.
This community-partnered thesis explores the impact of ReVision Youth Audits in promoting youth-friendly community spaces in Christchurch, a city undergoing long-term urban transformation following the 2010–2011 earthquakes. In partnership with ReVision, a not-for-profit organisation facilitating youth-led audits of public and community spaces, this research examines how audit recommendations have been implemented by organisations responsible for 23 previously audited sites. Using a mixed-methods approach, including an online stakeholder survey (n = 16) and semi-structured interviews (n = 2), the study identified variation in implementation outcomes, with non-profit organisations reporting higher adoption levels than local government entities. Stakeholders reported that commonly implemented recommendations included enhanced lighting, inclusive signage, additional seating, and youth-focused amenities such as murals, free Wi-Fi, and gender-neutral toilets. The average youth-friendliness score increased from 4.7 to 7.5 out of 10 following implementations, reflecting tangible improvements in accessibility, inclusivity, and youth engagement. Despite these gains, several barriers limited full implementation. Local government stakeholders cited procedural delays, regulatory frameworks, and funding cycles tied to long- term planning. At the same time, non-profits stakeholders faced constraints such as property ownership and limited influence over shared spaces. Challenges related to timing, staffing capacity, and the absence of follow-up mechanisms were also reported. Stakeholders recomended integrating youth input in the design process earlier, as several audits occurred after key planning phases. Feedback on the audit process was largely positive, with high ratings for the clarity of recommendations and the tool's credibility. However, stakeholders advocated for refinements when recording the audit recommendations to capture young people's lived experiences better and sustain youth involvement beyond the initial audit phase. The research demonstrates that the ReVision Youth Audit framework contributes to meaningful improvements in public spaces especially for youth and reinforces the value of youth-informed urban design. This research provides practical guidance for enhancing youth engagement in urban planning and improving the long-term utility of participatory audit frameworks, based on an analysis of both the factors that enabled and those that constrained the implementation of audit recommendations.
Contemporary organisations operate in rapidly evolving complex and ambiguous environments for which traditional change management approaches are insufficient. Under these conditions, organisations need to demonstrate learning and adaptive capabilities to effectively manage crises. Yet, the swift development and enactment of these capabilities can be particularly challenging for large, operationally diverse, and financially constrained public-sector organisations such as universities. Despite growing need for evidence-based research to guide crisis and change management in the higher education sector, the organisational literature offers limited insights. The combined impact of the 2010 and 2011 Canterbury earthquakes with a well-advanced restructure provided an opportunity to investigate institutional adaptation to and management of a compounded planned change (i.e., restructure) and an unplanned change (i.e., natural disaster response) at a university. Beginning in 2016, individual semi-structured interviews were conducted with 20 middle and senior university managers to capture their perspectives of compounded planned and unplanned change management, covering views of leadership, and of operational, structural, relational, and extra-organisational factors. Data were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis. The analysis coalesced into two overarching themes: Change Management Approaches and Lessons Learned through Change. Change Management Approaches evince institutional adaptation factors, along with barriers and enablers to effective change management, arising from the interplay of, and tensions between, leadership capabilities and a longstanding participatory culture. Lessons Learned through Change encompass business continuity mechanisms, and the learning opportunities seized and missed by leaders. The findings assert the primacy of workforce capabilities to 21st-century organisational success and thriving and substantiate that the calibre and availability of workforce capability is contingent on organisational culture and leadership. Leaders must ensure organisational agility by empowering employees, leveraging and integrating their contributions within and across functional units, and promoting effective two-way communication. The research argues for a hybrid repertoire of versatile dynamic organisational leadership qualities and capabilities to effectively navigate the multidimensional challenges and uncertainties in this sector and 21st-century business conditions. Of overarching significance to this repertoire is purpose-oriented emotionally intelligent leadership that honours the individual and collective dignity, diversity, and intelligence of all employees. This research empirically evidences the co-occurrence of planned and unplanned change in contemporary society, and continuous organisational adaptation and resilience to navigate the persistent volatility during a protracted crisis. Accordingly, the thesis argues that continued bifurcation of planned and unplanned change fields, and strategic and change management leadership theories is untenable, and that an integrated framework of organisational leadership and change management methodologies is required for organisations to effectively respond to and navigate the challenges and volatility of contemporary organisational contexts.
