The North Canterbury and Marlborough regions of Aotearoa | New Zealand were severely impacted by almost 30,000 landslides triggered during the 2016 Kaikōura Earthquake. Of these landslides approximately 200 dammed rivers. In the study area near Waiau, rupture of The Humps and Leader faults (and associated ground motions) initiated at least 42 co-seismic landslides. The Leader Landslide is the largest of these landslides, with an area of approximately 600,000 m2 and a volume of 6-8 million m3. The landslide buried approximately 980 m of active Leader River bed length and dammed the river. The dam produced four lakes, with two remaining today and two having been breached by partial landslide collapse and knickpoint migration in the year following the earthquake. As of 2025, the landslide dam has not been completely breached and Lake Rebekah remains. The Leader Landslide dam presents a unique opportunity to chart the evolution of the active riverbed pre- and post-earthquake, for up to 2 km downstream of Lake Rebekah. The river’s evolutionary timeline was observed using LiDAR, satellite aerial imagery, and drone surveys from 2001 to 2024 to develop maps and topographic difference models. Key timeframes for riverbed change events were also constrained with information and dated photography gathered from previous communications with the landowners at Woodchester Station, where the landslide is located. Finally, Schmidt Hammer testing of the Pliocene-Miocene Greta Siltstone Formation was conducted to investigate the role of bedrock strength on the rate of riverbed erosion. I present the history of evolution of the Leader River, pre- and post-earthquake, and consider factors impacting riverbed morphology changes. Despite the stability of Lake Rebekah, these data show that the position and morphology of the Leader River has changed significantly in response to the landslide, with the formation of two knickpoint waterfalls up to 14 m-high, four waterbodies, and diversion of the river around the landslide toe. Evolution of the river is characterised by longer periods of stasis (e.g., months to years) punctuated by rapid changes in riverbed morphology (e.g., hours to weeks) associated with incision and aggradation. In particular, the knickpoints migrated upstream at variable spatial and temporal rates. Factors controlling the rates of processes include; rain-storm events, partial lake outburst flooding, spatial changes in Pliocene-Miocene siltstone bed induration and landowner intervention to stabilise the landslide dam. An overarching conclusion of this thesis is that landforms can develop rapidly (i.e., hours to weeks) and in the absence of historical accounts, could be interpreted to have formed over hundreds to thousands of years.
Under the framework of New Public Management, the government has decentralised the responsibility for Disaster Risk Management (DRM) to regional, local, and community levels in New Zealand. This decentralisation serves political agendas related to resource allocation and is supported by empirical evidence suggesting that involving communities in DRM during recovery decision-making enhances disaster resilience. Extensive evidence indicates that community participation in DRM, especially during recovery decision-making, can significantly improve recovery outcomes at the community level. However, there has been limited research into whether the legal framework in New Zealand effectively facilitates meaningful public engagement to empower the public in influencing disaster recovery decisions. To address this gap in the literature, this thesis aims to explore the extent to which legislative and governance arrangements transfer the responsibility, liability, and costs of managing disaster risks to local levels without enabling meaningful public contribution to and influence on recovery decisions affecting them. Situated within Public Law and Disaster Risk and Resilience disciplines and using a case study of Greater Christchurch, New Zealand, this interdisciplinary thesis examines both common law and statutory provisions in the legal framework impacting public engagement before and during recovery from the Canterbury Earthquake Sequence. In particular, this thesis assesses how legislative, and governance frameworks influenced communities’ ability to influence recovery decision-making following the 2010-2011 Canterbury Earthquake Sequence (CES). This thesis shows that before the CES, the New Zealand public engagement system closely adhered to the common law principle of the ‘duty to consult’, which remains the current legal standard. This principle required decision-makers to use the 'public notice and comment' approach as a minimum, limiting meaningful community participation in decision-making. After the earthquakes, reliance on this traditional approach caused growing frustration and division locally, as the public struggled to effectively engage in and influence recovery decisions, resulting in new community activism. The Canterbury Earthquake Recovery Act (CER Act), introduced following the Christchurch Earthquake, included innovative provisions on public engagement. However, for various reasons, this Act appeared to have minimal impact on meaningful public engagement in recovery decision-making, which continued to align with the broader, existing public engagement system and associated norms. The empirical findings indicate that despite the novel legislative language, the traditional public engagement framework in New Zealand constrained effective engagement, leading to a broader erosion of trust between the public and the government. This was largely attributed to the default ‘public notice and comment’ approach at the local government level, with inadequate mechanisms for community engagement in central government decision-making shaping the expectations of recovery decision-makers still operating within this framework. Notable departures from this traditional approach were evident in the practices of the Waimakariri District Council and Christchurch City Council. Particularly noteworthy was the ‘Share an Idea’ public engagement campaign. Unlike conventional processes, it did not commence with a near-final or draft document. Instead, it utilised participatory mechanisms that fostered meaningful dialogue, enabling the public to significantly shape the content of the draft Christchurch Central Recovery Plan. The initial success of such participatory engagement underscores its potential effectiveness throughout the entire recovery planning process, an option that was not exercised by the central government. In conclusion, this thesis argues that New Zealand should move beyond the entrenched ‘public notice and comment’ approach and adopt more open and inclusive public participation mechanisms. It contends that supplementing this approach with proactive participatory methods before disasters could yield favorable outcomes during disaster recovery, thereby ensuring meaningful public involvement in future decisions that affect communities.
