The "Lyttelton Review" newsletter for 29 August 2011, produced by the Lyttelton Harbour Information Centre.
An entry from Ruth Gardner's blog for 6 March 2011 entitled, "Cordon Confusion".
A story submitted by Elizabeth to the QuakeStories website.
A story submitted by Peter Seager to the QuakeStories website.
A story submitted by Jennifer to the QuakeStories website.
A news item titled, "Lyttelton Recovery Process Could Be Improved", published on the Lyttelton Harbour Information Centre's website on Thursday, 13 October 2011.
The "Lyttelton Review" newsletter for 8 August 2011, produced by the Lyttelton Harbour Information Centre.
A story submitted by Lynette Evans to the QuakeStories website.
An entry from Ruth Gardner's blog for 6 March 2011 entitled, "We're in the Red!".
An entry from Ruth Gardner's blog for 27 March 2011 entitled, "Day 34 inside the red zone".
The "Lyttelton Review" newsletter for 3 October 2011, produced by the Lyttelton Harbour Information Centre.
An entry from Jennifer Middendorf's blog for 16 March 2011 entitled, "Hotdesking".
The "Lyttelton Review" newsletter for 24 October 2011, produced by the Lyttelton Harbour Information Centre.
A copy of the CanCERN online newsletter published on 30 September 2011
The "Lyttelton Review" newsletter for 7 November 2011, produced by the Lyttelton Harbour Information Centre.
The "Lyttelton Review" newsletter for 19 December 2011, produced by the Lyttelton Harbour Information Centre.
A story submitted by Peter Low to the QuakeStories website.
On September the 4th 2010 and February 22nd 2011 the Canterbury region of New Zealand was shaken by two massive earthquakes. This paper is set broadly within the civil defence and emergency management literature and informed by recent work on community participation and social capital in the building of resilient cities. Work in this area indicates a need to recognise both the formal institutional response to the earthquakes as well as the substantive role communities play in their own recovery. The range of factors that facilitate or hinder community involvement also needs to be better understood. This paper interrogates the assumption that recovery agencies and officials are both willing and able to engage communities who are themselves willing and able to be engaged in accordance with recovery best practice. Case studies of three community groups – CanCERN, Greening the Rubble and Gap Filler – illustrate some of the difficulties associated with becoming a community during the disaster recovery phase. Based on my own observations and experiences, combined with data from approximately 50 in-depth interviews with Christchurch residents and representatives from community groups, the Christchurch City Council, the Earthquake Commission and so on, this paper outlines some practical strategies emerging communities may use in the early disaster recovery phase that then strengthens their ability to ‘participate’ in the recovery process.
A copy of the CanCERN online newsletter published on 18 November 2011
A copy of the CanCERN online newsletter published on 16 September 2011
A news item titled, "2 Billion Infrasture Deal Cleared", published on the Lyttelton Harbour Information Centre's website on Friday, 23 September 2011.
An entry from Jennifer Middendorf's blog for 30 October 2011 entitled, "Back in the CBD".
A copy of the CanCERN online newsletter published on 9 December 2011
A copy of the CanCERN online newsletter published on 5 November 2011
A copy of the CanCERN online newsletter published on 26 August 2011
The "Lyttelton Review" newsletter for 12 September 2011, produced by the Lyttelton Harbour Information Centre.
The "Lyttelton Review" newsletter for 31 October 2011, produced by the Lyttelton Harbour Information Centre.
A copy of the CanCERN online newsletter published on 8 July 2011
A copy of the CanCERN online newsletter published on 6 October 2011
A copy of the CanCERN online newsletter published on 23 September 2011