Ruth Gardner's Blog 22/02/2014: Sacred Space
Articles, UC QuakeStudies
An entry from Ruth Gardner's Blog for 22 February 2014 entitled, "Sacred Space".
An entry from Ruth Gardner's Blog for 22 February 2014 entitled, "Sacred Space".
An entry from Ruth Gardner's Blog for 08 January 2014 entitled, "Touring the Town".
An entry from Ruth Gardner's Blog for 20 June 2014 entitled, "Doctor's Discussion".
An entry from Jennifer Middendorf's blog for 25 August 2014 entitled, "Tohoku 2011".
Summary of oral history interview with Alice Ridley about her experiences of the Canterbury earthquakes.
An entry from Deb Robertson's blog for 11 April 2014 entitled, "On brokenness".The entry was downloaded on 3 November 2016.
An entry from Ruth Gardner's Blog for 05 February 2014 entitled, "Monumento Mori?".
An entry from Jennifer Middendorf's blog for 21 January 2014 entitled, "Weekend wanderings".
An entry from Deb Robertson's blog for 30 July 2014 entitled, "Searching for hope..."The entry was downloaded on 3 November 2016.
An entry from Jennifer Middendorf's blog for 27 July 2014 entitled, "(Re) Openings".
An entry from Jennifer Middendorf's blog for 24 February 2014 entitled, "VIPs, flowers and hail".
An entry from Ruth Gardner's Blog for 19 February 2014 entitled, "Spires Sculpture".
A story submitted by Sue Hamer to the QuakeStories website.
The UC CEISMIC Canterbury Earthquakes Digital Archive contains tens of thousands of high value cultural heritage items related to a long series of earthquakes that hit Canterbury, New Zealand, from 2010 - 2012. The archive was built by a Digital Humanities team located at the center of the disaster in New Zealand's second largest city, Christchurch. The project quickly became complex, not only in its technical aspects but in its governance and general management. This talk will provide insight into the national and international management and governance frameworks used to successfully build and deliver the archive into operation. Issues that needed to be managed included human ethics, research ethics, stakeholder management, communications, risk management, curation and ingestion policy, copyright and content licensing, and project governance. The team drew heavily on industry-standard project management methods for the basic approach, but built their ecosystem and stakeholder trust on principles derived directly form the global digital humanities community.
The quality of multi-owned residential buildings and the capability to maintain that quality into the future is important in preserving not only the monetary value of such housing (Lujanen, 2010) but also the quality of life for its residents. The aim of this paper is to examine the governance and decision-making rules and regulations as they relate to the undertaking of major repairs in multi-owned residential buildings in Finland and New Zealand with particular regard to the Finnish Limited Liability Housing Companies Act 2010 (LLHCA 2010) and the New Zealand Unit Titles Act 2010 (UTA 2010). Currently, major building repairs are topical issues in both countries; in Finland as a result of ageing buildings requiring major re-fitting of pipes and other infrastructure, and in New Zealand as a result of earthquake damage in Christchurch and Leaky Building Syndrome nationwide. Major repairs can be a significant financial burden to unit owners and collective decisions can be difficult to achieve. Interestingly, new legislation that governs multi-owned housing was enacted in both countries in 2010. The recent enactment of this legislation provides an opportunity to examine the UTA 2010 and LLHCA 2010 with regard to how they address major repairs, improvements in housing stock and the financing possibilities associated with these undertakings. More specifically this paper explores housing intensification (i.e. building up, out or alongside existing multi-owned residential buildings on commonly owned land) as a means of financing major repairs. The comparison of governance and decision-making in two different shared ownership systems with different histories and cultural contexts provides a chance to explore the possibilities and challenges that each country faces, and the potential to learn from each other’s practices and develop these further. In this regard the findings from this paper contribute to the academic literature (Bugden 2005; Easthope & Randolph 2009; Dupuis & Dixon 2010; Lujanen 2010; Easthope, Hudson & Randolph 2013) concerning to the governance of multi-owned housing as it relates to intensive housing development and its wider social and economic implications.