We Lived Here: Oxford Terrace Photograph 080
Images, UC QuakeStudies
A photograph of the hallway of Donna Allfrey's house at 406 Oxford Terrace. To the right, a couch has been upturned and placed against a mantelpiece in one of the rooms.
A photograph of the hallway of Donna Allfrey's house at 406 Oxford Terrace. To the right, a couch has been upturned and placed against a mantelpiece in one of the rooms.
A photograph of a room in Donna Allfrey's house at 406 Oxford Terrace. The fireplace has been removed and boarded up with gib board. The mantelpiece has been propped in front of the gib board, and two couches have been placed on their sides next to it.
A video of an interview with Andy Dodd, archaeologist at Underground Overground Archaeology, and Rewi Couch, representative for Te Hapu o Ngai Te Wheke, about the excavation of the site of the former Lyttelton Post Office on Norwich Quay. A Maori adze was found by the archaeologists deep beneath the concrete foundations of the building. The adze is a woodworking tool which indicates that early Maori settlers may have carved and launched waka on the site.
The contents of this dissertation explores the renovation of Noah’s hotel which was left abandoned after the 2011 Christchurch earthquake. With the current state of New Zealand as of now, rent prices plummeting, and the ongoing mass emigration proves the country’s increased cost of living. A trend of ‘hidden homelessness’ in the forms of couch surfing and overcrowding tenancies evinces a mass economic displacement. This thesis is driven by means of speculation and of hope that by utilising Christchurch’s dilapidated sites can be transformed into safe havens for those evicted. Guided by the six principles of heterotopia introduced by Michel Foucault, the proposed co-living hotel determines to attest societal perception of hotels, and introduce a reality that alleviates a community from political and economical instability. In terms of Christchurch’s landscape, the hotel itself lies within Maltese Cross, layout planned in 1850 which defines the CBD’S unique urbanscape. Historic landmarks and erected projects use the cross as a guide in tandem with legislative policies strictly imposing the importance of view protection for heritage buildings - a notion made compulsory especially after the earthquake. By taking inspiration from Gordon Matta-Clark’s methodology of Conical Intersects, voids through the building act as viewshafts, each introducing key sites important to Christchurch. These voids simultaneously house integral communal areas and narrates a timeline of Ōtautahi’s crucial events
Picture this, you are relaxing at home enjoying the afternoon sun. It is another beautiful Christchurch day in late 2017. There is a knock at the door, you’ve been expecting it. It is a member of the Christchurch Health and Development Study, here to conduct your prearranged interview. The interview request did not come as a surprise of course, you have been participating in these interviews yourself sporadically throughout your adult life, and prior to that you attended many alongside your parents. In fact, you have been answering the studies interview your whole life. Transcripts of these interviews sit in the studies database alongside copies of school reports, health records and a wealth of other information. It has been this way since birth, since your mother was approached back in 1977, not long after you had arrived in this world, and asked if she would consent to participating in the study. She, along with many other Cantabrian new mothers from that year, agreed and the Christchurch Health and Development Study was born. Since then, these interviews have become a matter of routine for you. As life went on many things changed, but one thing that was constant was the sporadic visit from an interviewer of the study. The current interview is a little different from most of the others, however. Last time an interviewer visited in 2012, you were asked if you would like to conduct an earthquake-specific interview, you agreed. This time, the same question was asked. Why? Well because you were there that day of course. The day of the 22nd February 2011 when a major earthquake struck Canterbury. You were there in the centre of the city as buildings came crashing down and people ran for safety. You were there for the chaos. Your knee dully aches, it never did quite heal properly and strangely seems to flare up whenever you think back to that day. A lasting reminder. It is a difficult subject, but you agree to the second earthquake-specific interview. You understand the purpose of the study, and the value of the data collected. You take a sip of the cup of tea politely made upon the interviewer’s arrival, lean back into the comfort of your couch and cast your mind back to that fateful day. So, what does this study mean? Why still participate, all these years later? Over time it has become more apparent as to how valuable this information could be, considering all the experiences through the life course, and to think of the experiences that others in the cohort have had too. How differently have events affected people from all walks of life, who just so happened to be born within the same few months. We can use the data from this study to better understand situations when using life course characteristics which can hopefully influence decision making and population health within New Zealand.