Jennifer Middendorf's Blog 23/02/2011: We're evacuating
Articles, UC QuakeStudies
An entry from Jennifer Middendorf's blog for 23 February 2011 entitled, "We're evacuating".
An entry from Jennifer Middendorf's blog for 23 February 2011 entitled, "We're evacuating".
A story submitted by Anonymous to the QuakeStories website.
A story submitted by Paul Sterk to the QuakeStories website.
Research following the 2010-2011 Canterbury earthquakes investigated the minimum vertical reinforcement required in RC walls to generate well distributed cracking in the plastic hinge region. However, the influence of the loading sequence and rate has not been fully addressed. The new minimum vertical reinforcement limits in NZS 3101:2006 (Amendment 3) include consideration of the material strengths under dynamic load rates, but these provisions have not been validated at a member or system level. A series of tests were conducted on RC prisms to investigate the effect of loading rate and sequence on the local behaviour of RC members. Fifteen axially loaded RC prisms with the designs representing the end region of RC walls were tested under various loading rates to cover the range of pseudo-static and earthquake loading scenarios. These tests will provide substantial data for understanding the local behaviour of RC members, including hysteretic load-deformation behaviour, crack patterns, failure mode, steel strain, strain rate and ductility. Recommendations will be made regarding the effect of loading rate and reinforcement content on the cracking behaviour and ductility of RC members.
A story submitted by Lin to the QuakeStories website.
A story submitted by Joan Curry to the QuakeStories website.
Buildings subject to earthquake shaking will tend to move not only horizontally but also rotate in plan. In-plan rotation is known as “building torsion” and it may occur for a variety of reasons, including stiffness and strength eccentricity and/or torsional effects from ground motions. Methods to consider torsion in structural design standards generally involve analysis of the structure in its elastic state. This is despite the fact that the structural elements can yield, thereby significantly altering the building response and the structural element demands. If demands become too large, the structure may collapse. While a number of studies have been conducted into the behavior of structures considering inelastic building torsion, there appears to be no consensus that one method is better than another and as a result, provisions within current design standards have not adopted recent proposals in the literature. However, the Canterbury Earthquakes Royal Commission recently made the recommendation that provisions to account for inelastic torsional response of buildings be introduced within New Zealand building standards. Consequently, this study examines how and to what extent the torsional response due to system eccentricity may affect the seismic performance of a building and considers what a simple design method should account for. It is concluded that new methods should be simple, be applicable to both the elastic and inelastic range of response, consider bidirectional excitation and include guidance for multi-story systems.
A story submitted by Shaun to the QuakeStories website.
A story submitted by Kalena to the QuakeStories website.
A story submitted by Lynette Evans to the QuakeStories website.
A story submitted by Alasdair Wright to the QuakeStories website.
A story submitted by Julie to the QuakeStories website.
A story submitted by Paul Murray to the QuakeStories website.
A story submitted by Angela to the QuakeStories website.
A story submitted by Kris to the QuakeStories website.
A story submitted by Adam to the QuakeStories website.
An entry from Deb Robertson's blog for 26 August 2014 entitled, "Election time".The entry was downloaded on 2 November 2016.
A story submitted by Anonymous to the QuakeStories website.
A story submitted by Leanne to the QuakeStories website.
A story submitted by Patti-Ann Oberst to the QuakeStories website.
A story submitted by Hilary Lakeman to the QuakeStories website.
A story submitted by Celina Elliott to the QuakeStories website.
A story submitted by Ian Longhorn to the QuakeStories website.
A story submitted by Sue Freeman to the QuakeStories website.
A story submitted by Julie Lee to the QuakeStories website.
A story submitted by Dee Dawson to the QuakeStories website.
A story submitted by Louise to the QuakeStories website.
A story submitted by Hebe Kearney to the QuakeStories website.
A story submitted by Kathleen Himiona to the QuakeStories website.
A story submitted by Jo Nicholls-Parker and Petra Van Asten to the QuakeStories website.