Good driver behaviour flyer
Articles, UC QuakeStudies
An example of a public flyer promoting good driver behaviour, handed out in areas of traffic detours or delays.
An example of a public flyer promoting good driver behaviour, handed out in areas of traffic detours or delays.
An entry from Deb Robertson's blog for 13 September 2010 entitled, "A Present a Week {till Christmas} Week 10".
An entry from Deb Robertson's blog for 7 September 2010 entitled, "Tomorrow is another day!".
A story submitted by Olive Russell to the QuakeStories website.
An entry from Deb Robertson's blog for 23 December 2011 entitled, "Noooooo! It's happened again... More earthquakes".
An entry from Jennifer Middendorf's blog for 6 August 2011 entitled, "Kitty Prozac".
An entry from Deb Robertson's blog for 24 June 2011 entitled, "My 'be prepared' bag...".
An entry from Deb Robertson's blog for 15 June 2011 entitled, "There has been more earthquakes but we are ok...".
A story submitted by blair to the QuakeStories website.
A story submitted by Anonymous to the QuakeStories website.
A story submitted by Brendan Evans to the QuakeStories website.
A story submitted by Susan to the QuakeStories website.
A story submitted by Wendy Everingham to the QuakeStories website.
A story submitted by Andrew to the QuakeStories website.
A story submitted by Mary to the QuakeStories website.
A story submitted by Phoebe to the QuakeStories website.
A story submitted by Jo to the QuakeStories website.
A story submitted by Dave to the QuakeStories website.
An entry from Deb Robertson's blog for 26 November 2011 entitled, "It's been a long twelve months.... or keeping it real parenting teenagers".
Buildings subject to earthquake shaking will tend to move not only horizontally but also rotate in plan. In-plan rotation is known as “building torsion” and it may occur for a variety of reasons, including stiffness and strength eccentricity and/or torsional effects from ground motions. Methods to consider torsion in structural design standards generally involve analysis of the structure in its elastic state. This is despite the fact that the structural elements can yield, thereby significantly altering the building response and the structural element demands. If demands become too large, the structure may collapse. While a number of studies have been conducted into the behavior of structures considering inelastic building torsion, there appears to be no consensus that one method is better than another and as a result, provisions within current design standards have not adopted recent proposals in the literature. However, the Canterbury Earthquakes Royal Commission recently made the recommendation that provisions to account for inelastic torsional response of buildings be introduced within New Zealand building standards. Consequently, this study examines how and to what extent the torsional response due to system eccentricity may affect the seismic performance of a building and considers what a simple design method should account for. It is concluded that new methods should be simple, be applicable to both the elastic and inelastic range of response, consider bidirectional excitation and include guidance for multi-story systems.
An entry from Jennifer Middendorf's blog for 2 January 2012 entitled, "Yeah, we get it, it's not over yet".
A story submitted by Anonymous to the QuakeStories website.
A story submitted by James to the QuakeStories website.
A story submitted by Claudia Chernishoff to the QuakeStories website.
A story submitted by Anonymous to the QuakeStories website.
A story submitted by Anonymous to the QuakeStories website.
A story submitted by Jonathan Odom to the QuakeStories website.
A story submitted by margaret price to the QuakeStories website.
A story submitted by Adele Geradts to the QuakeStories website.
A story submitted by Paul Swettenham to the QuakeStories website.