Ruth Gardner's Blog 24/10/2013: Potential Park
Articles, UC QuakeStudies
An entry from Ruth Gardner's Blog for 24 October 2013 entitled, "Potential Park".
An entry from Ruth Gardner's Blog for 24 October 2013 entitled, "Potential Park".
An entry from Ruth Gardner's blog for 3 March 2013 entitled, "Steadfast Sculpture?".
An entry from Ruth Gardner's blog for 14 March 2013 entitled, "Garden Greens".
The "Lyttelton Harbour Review" newsletter for 11 March 2013, produced by the Lyttelton Harbour Information Centre.
The "Lyttelton Harbour Review" newsletter for 17 February 2013, produced by the Lyttelton Harbour Information Centre.
The "Lyttelton Harbour Review" newsletter for 13 May 2013, produced by the Lyttelton Harbour Information Centre.
The "Lyttelton Harbour Review" newsletter for 4 March 2013, produced by the Lyttelton Harbour Information Centre.
An entry from Ruth Gardner's Blog for 21 November 2013 entitled, "Play Park".
A copy of the CanCERN online newsletter published on 1 March 2013
A copy of the CanCERN online newsletter published on 12 July 2013
An entry from Ruth Gardner's Blog for 30 October 2013 entitled, "Agropolis Area".
An entry from Ruth Gardner's blog for 16 February 2013 entitled, "Transferred Topsoil".
The "Lyttelton Harbour Review" newsletter for 6 May 2013, produced by the Lyttelton Harbour Information Centre.
A copy of the CanCERN online newsletter published on 15 February 2013
A copy of the CanCERN online newsletter published on 8 February 2013
The "Lyttelton Harbour Review" newsletter for 29 July 2013, produced by the Lyttelton Harbour Information Centre.
A public talk by Nicole Lauenstein, Architect, urban design and planning. This talk, entitled 'Sustainable urban living...working, sleeping, playing, running, laughing...in Christchurch again...a new process', formed part of the Plenary Three session, 'Designing the future'.
An entry from Ruth Gardner's Blog for 26 October 2013 entitled, "Plant-a Park".
A series of earthquakes has forced Christchurch to re-plan and rebuild. Discussions about rebuilding strategies have emphasized the intention of making it a city for the future, sustainable and vibrant. This paper discusses the relationship between microclimate and urban culture in Christchurch based upon the concept of urban comfort. It explores the relationships between environment, people and culture to help understand the local requirements for urban landscape design. In this paper we claim that cultural requirements also should be taken into account when looking for sustainable strategies. A distinctive feature of this research is its focus on the way people are adapting to both surviving prequake and new post‐quake environments. Preliminary findings from the first year of field work using participant observation and 61 in‐depth interviews with Christchurch residents are presented. The interviews were carried out in a variety of urban settings including: established sites (places sustaining relatively little damage) and emerging sites (those requiring rebuilding) during 2011‐2012. Evidence from the interviews highlight future challenges regarding sustainability and urban comfort issues. Post‐quake Christchurch presents a remarkable opportunity to design an urban landscape which provides environmental, economic, social and cultural sustainability. However, to achieve successful outcomes it is fundamental to respond to the local culture. Field data suggest that the strong connections between urban and rural settings present in local culture, lifestyle and landscape generate a particular aesthetic and recreation preference for urban spaces, which should be considered in the urban landscape design strategies.
An entry from Ruth Gardner's blog for 30 April 2013 entitled, "Plants at Piko".
A PDF copy of pages 122-123 of the book Christchurch: The Transitional City Pt IV. The pages document the transitional project 'We Love Pop Up'. Photo with permission: SHAC
Summary of oral history interview with Raewyn Iketau about her experiences of the Canterbury earthquakes.
An entry from Ruth Gardner's blog for 25 January 2013 entitled, "Preservation Project".
Transcript of Grant Simpson's earthquake story, captured by the UC QuakeBox project.
A copy of the CanCERN online newsletter published on 22 February 2013
A copy of the CanCERN online newsletter published on 3 May 2013
A copy of the CanCERN online newsletter published on 15 March 2013
A copy of the CanCERN online newsletter published on 29 November 2013
An entry from Deb Robertson's blog for 8 January 2013 entitled, "Venturing into the central city....".
Group case study report prepared for lecturers Ton Buhrs and Roy Montgomery by students of ERST 635 at Lincoln University, 2013.The New Zealand Government’s decision to establish a unitary authority in the Auckland Region has provided much of the context and impetus for this review of current governance arrangements in the Canterbury region, to determine whether or not they are optimal for taking the communities of greater Christchurch into the future. A number of local governance academics, as well as several respected political pundits, have prophesised that the Auckland ‘Super City’ reforms of 2009 will have serious implications and ramifications for local governance arrangements in other major cities, particularly Wellington and Christchurch. Wellington councils have already responded to the possibility of change by undertaking a series of reports on local governance arrangements, as well as a major review led by Sir Geoffrey Palmer, to investigate options for governance reform. Alongside these developments, the Christchurch earthquakes beginning in September 2010 have raised a myriad of new and complex governance issues, which may or may not be able to be addressed under the status quo, while the replacement of Regional Councillors’ with centrally-appointed Commissioners is suggestive of government dissatisfaction with current arrangements. With these things in mind, the research group has considered local government in Canterbury and the greater Christchurch area in the wider governance context. It does not limit discussion to only the structure of local government in Canterbury but rather, as the brief (Appendix 1) indicates, considers more broadly the relationship between central, regional, and local tiers of government, as well as the relationship between local government and local communities.