Infrastructure damage in Lyttelton.
Rock falls in redcliffs.
Rock falls in redcliffs.
Rock falls in redcliffs.
New Bridge in Ferrymead.
Infrastructure damage in Lyttelton.
Damaged footpath in Lyttelton.
Infrastructure damage in Lyttelton.
Infrastructure damage in Lyttelton.
Collapse of Shag Rock.
Infrastructure damage in Lyttelton.
A truck dumps rubbish.
Liquefaction flooding in Travis Country.
Earthquake rubbish dump at Bottlelake Forest.
Earthquake rubbish dump at Bottlelake Forest.
Erosion scarp along North New Brighton Beach.
Damaged road around the Avon-Heathcote Estuary.
Erosion scarp along North New Brighton Beach.
Container wall protecting road from rock falls.
Erosion scarp along North New Brighton Beach.
Damaged road around the Avon-Heathcote Estuary.
Container wall protecting road from rock falls.
Container wall protecting road from rock falls.
Container wall protecting road from rock falls.
Damaged road around the Avon-Heathcote Estuary.
Erosion scarp along North New Brighton Beach.
Old damaged bridge in Ferrymead next to the new one.
Paper 201In order to provide information related to seismic vulnerability of non-ductile reinforced concrete (RC) frame buildings, and as a complementary investigation on innovative feasible retrofit solutions developed in the past six years at the University of Canterbury on pre-19170 reinforced concrete buildings, a frame building representative of older construction practice was tested on the shake table. The specimen, 1/2.5 scale, consists of two 3-storey 2-bay asymmetric frames in parallel, one interior and one exterior, jointed together by transverse beams and floor slabs. The as-built (benchmark) specimen was first tested under increasing ground motion amplitudes using records from Loma Prieta Earthquake (California, 1989) and suffered significant damage at the upper floor, most of it due to lap splices failure. As a consequence, in a second stage, the specimen was repaired and modified by removing the concrete in the lap splice region, welding the column longitudinal bars, replacing the removed concrete with structural mortar, and injecting cracks with epoxy resin. The modified as-built specimen was then tested using data recorded during Darfield (New Zealand, 2010) and Maule (Chile, 2010) Earthquakes, with whom the specimen showed remarkably different responses attributed to the main variation in frequency content and duration. In this contribution, the seismic performance of the three series of experiments are presented and compared.