
This paper shows an understanding of the availability of resources in post-disaster reconstruction and recovery in Christchurch, New Zealand following its September 4, 2010 and February 22, 2011 earthquakes. Overseas experience in recovery demonstrates how delays and additional costs may incur if the availability of resources is not aligned with the reconstruction needs. In the case of reconstruction following Christchurch earthquakes, access to normal resource levels will be insufficient. An on-line questionnaire survey, combined with in-depth interviews was used to collect data from the construction professionals that had been participated in the post-earthquake reconstruction. The study identified the resources that are subject to short supply and resourcing challenges that are currently faced by the construction industry. There was a varied degree of impacts felt by the surveyed organisations from resource shortages. Resource pressures were primarily concentrated on human resources associated with structural, architectural and land issues. The challenges that may continue playing out in the longer-term reconstruction of Christchurch include limited capacity of the construction industry, competition for skills among residential, infrastructure and commercial sectors, and uncertainties with respect to decision making. Findings provide implications informing the ongoing recovery and rebuild in New Zealand. http://www.iiirr.ucalgary.ca/Conference-2012
“To tell you is a great task, for I can assure you it is a most awful country,” wrote James Boot from Christchurch, New Zealand in letter to his parents in Nottingham, England in June, …
The 22 February 2011, Mw6.2 Christchurch earthquake is the most costly earthquake to affect New Zealand, causing an estimated 181 fatalities and severely damaging thousands of residential and commercial buildings. This paper presents a summary of some of the observations made by the NSF-sponsored GEER Team regarding the geotechnical/geologic aspects of this earthquake. The Team focused on documenting the occurrence and severity of liquefaction and lateral spreading, performance of building and bridge foundations, buried pipelines and levees, and significant rockfalls and landslides. Liquefaction was pervasive and caused extensive damage to residential properties, water and wastewater networks, high-rise buildings, and bridges. Entire neighborhoods subsided, resulting in flooding that caused further damage. Additionally, liquefaction and lateral spreading resulted in damage to bridges and to stretches of levees along the Waimakariri and Kaiapoi Rivers. Rockfalls and landslides in the Port Hills damaged several homes and caused several fatalities.
None
A video of an interview with Toni Burnside, the Principal of Central New Brighton School, about the proposed merger of her school with South New Brighton School. Burnside talks about her belief that the government's rationale for the merger exaggerated the earthquake damage to the site.
A video of people participating in the 'Bare Your Bum for Brighton' protest in New Brighton. The protest was organised by Pier Side Café owner Tony Brooks, as a humorous way of getting Christchurch city leaders to take notice of New Brighton after the 22 February 2011 earthquake.
Commemorates 1 year after the Christchurch Earthquake. In the Press newspaper section of the Fairfax New Zealand Stuff.co.nz news site.
After a year's earthquake-enforced absence, the New Zealand International Jazz and Blues Festival is back and opens in Christchurch this evening.
Page 17 of Section A of the Christchurch Press, published on Friday 17 February 2012.
Page 4 of Section B of the Christchurch Press, published on Tuesday 28 February 2012.
Page 14 of Section A of the Christchurch Press, published on Tuesday 3 April 2012.
Page 8 of Section C of the Christchurch Press, published on Saturday 14 April 2012.
Page 11 of Section B of the Christchurch Press, published on Wednesday 25 April 2012.
Page 4 of Section A of the Christchurch Press, published on Friday 18 May 2012.
Page 17 of Section G of the Christchurch Press, published on Saturday 19 May 2012.
Pages 20 and 21 of the Your Weekend section of the Christchurch Press, published on Saturday 19 May 2012.
Page 23 of the Your Weekend section of the Christchurch Press, published on Saturday 19 May 2012.
Page 7 of Section F of the Christchurch Press, published on Saturday 2 June 2012.
Page 8 of the Good Living section of the Christchurch Press, published on Thursday 28 June 2012.
Page 1 of the Escape section of the Christchurch Press, published on Monday 6 August 2012.
Page 2 of the Punt section of the Christchurch Press, published on Friday 17 August 2012.
Page 20 of Section C of the Christchurch Press, published on Saturday 18 August 2012.
Page 6 of Section A of the Christchurch Press, published on Tuesday 11 September 2012.
Page 15 of Section A of the Christchurch Press, published on Wednesday 12 September 2012.
Page 6 of Section D of the Christchurch Press, published on Saturday 10 November 2012.
Page 9 of Section A of the Christchurch Press, published on Friday 16 November 2012.
Page 10 of Section A of the Christchurch Press, published on Thursday 6 December 2012.
Page 21 of Section A of the Christchurch Press, published on Saturday 31 March 2012.
Page 7 of Section A of the Christchurch Press, published on Wednesday 28 March 2012.
Page 2 of the Punt section of the Christchurch Press, published on Thursday 11 October 2012.