Our Christchurch reporter Rachel Graham travelled to Japan, with the support of the Asia New Zealand Foundation, to find out.
This paper presents a seismic velocity model of Canterbury, New Zealand based on 3D geologic surfaces and velocities from a range of data sources. The model provides the 3D crustal structure in the region at multiple length scales for seismic wave propagation simulations, such as broadband ground motion and shallow site response analyses related to understanding the ground motions and site responses during the 2010- 2011 Canterbury earthquakes. Pre-Quaternary geologic horizons are calculated based on the reinterpretation of a comprehensive network of seismic reflection surveys from seven different campaigns over the past 50 years, as well as point constraints across an array of petroleum industry drill holes. Particular attention is given to a detailed representation of Quaternary stratigraphy, representing shallow (z<250m) near-surface layers in the model. Seismic velocities are obtained from seismic reflection processing (for Vp) and also recently performed active and passive surface wave analyses (for Vs). Over 1,700 water wells in the region are used to constrain the complex inter-bedded Quaternary stratigraphy (gravels, sands, silts, organics etc.) near the coastline, including beneath urban Christchurch, which has resulted from fluvial deposition and marine regression and transgression. For the near-surface Springston and Christchurch Formations in the Christchurch urban area (z<50m), high-spatial resolution seismic velocities (including Vs30 ) were obtained from over 13,000 cone penetration tests combined with a recently developed CPT-Vs correlation.
This presentation summarizes the development of high-resolution surficial soil velocity models in the Canterbury, New Zealand basin. Shallow (<30m) shear wave velocities were primarily computed based on a combination of a large database of over 15,000 cone penetration test (CPT) logs in and around Christchurch, and a recently-developed Christchurch-specific empirical correlation between soil shear wave velocity and CPT. Large active-source testing at 22 locations and ambient-wavefield surface wave and H/V testing at over 80 locations were utilized in combination with 1700 water well logs to constrain the inter-bedded stratigraphy and velocity of Quaternary sediments up to depths of several hundred meters. Finally, seismic reflection profiles and the ambient-wavefield surface wave data provide constraint on velocities from several hundred meters to several kilometres. At all depths, the high resolution data illustrates the complexity of the soil conditions in the region, and the developed 3D models are presently being used in broadband ground motion simulations to further interpret the observed strong ground motions in the 2010-2011 Canterbury earthquake sequence.
This study explored the experiences of 10 leaders in their intentional six-month implementation, during the 2010-2011Christchurch earthquakes, of an adapted positive leadership model. The study concluded that the combination of strategies in the model provided psychological and participative safety for leaders to learn and to apply new ways of working. Contrary to other studies on natural disaster, workplace performance increased and absenteeism decreased. The research contributes new knowledge to the positive leadership literature and new understanding, from the perspective of leaders, of the challenges of leading in a workplace environment of ongoing natural disaster events.
This thesis is concerned with springs that appeared in the Hillsborough, Christchurch during the 2010-2011 Canterbury Earthquake Sequence, and which have continued to discharge groundwater to the surface to the present time. Investigations have evolved, measurements of discharge at selected sites, limited chemical data on anions and isotope analysis. The springs are associated with earthquake generated fissures (extensional) and compression zones, mostly in loess-colluvium soils of the valley floor and lower slopes. Extensive peat swamps are present in the Hillsborough valley, with a groundwater table at ~1m below ground. The first appearance of the ‘new’ springs took place following the Mw 7.1 Darfield Earthquake on 4 September 2010, and discharges increased both in volume and extent of the Christchurch Mw 6.3 Earthquake of 22 February 2011. Five monitored sites show flow rates in the range of 4.2-14.4L/min, which have remained effectively constant for the duration of the study (2014-2015). Water chemistry analysis shows that the groundwater discharges are sourced primarily from volcanic bedrocks which underlies the valley at depths ≤50m below ground level. Isotope values confirm similarities with bedrock-sourced groundwater, and the short term (hours-days) influence of extreme rainfall events. Cyclone Lusi (2013-2014) affects were monitored and showed recovery of the bedrock derived water signature within 72 hours. Close to the mouth of the valley sediments interfinger with Waimakiriri River derived alluvium bearing a distinct and different isotope signature. Some mixing is evident at certain locations, but it is not clear if there is any influence from the Huntsbury reservoir which failed in the Port Hills Earthquake (22 February 2011) and stored groundwater from the Christchurch artesian aquifer system (Riccarton Gravel).
Page 21 of Section A of the Christchurch Press, published on Saturday 31 January 2015.
Page 7 of Section E of the Christchurch Press, published on Saturday 31 January 2015.
Page 2 of Section E of the Christchurch Press, published on Saturday 31 January 2015.
Page 5 of the Punt section of the Christchurch Press, published on Friday 30 January 2015.
Page 4 of the Punt section of the Christchurch Press, published on Friday 30 January 2015.
Page 7 of the Punt section of the Christchurch Press, published on Friday 30 January 2015.
Page 18 of Section G of the Christchurch Press, published on Saturday 31 January 2015.
Page 10 of Section A of the Christchurch Press, published on Friday 30 January 2015.
Page 5 of Section G of the Christchurch Press, published on Saturday 31 January 2015.
Page 20 of Section A of the Christchurch Press, published on Friday 30 January 2015.
Page 11 of Section G of the Christchurch Press, published on Saturday 31 January 2015.
Page 14 of Section G of the Christchurch Press, published on Saturday 31 January 2015.
Page 3 of Section A of the Christchurch Press, published on Saturday 31 January 2015.
Page 2 of Section A of the Christchurch Press, published on Saturday 31 January 2015.
Page 7 of Section A of the Christchurch Press, published on Saturday 31 January 2015.
Page 1 of Section A of the Christchurch Press, published on Saturday 31 January 2015.
Page 5 of Section A of the Christchurch Press, published on Saturday 31 January 2015.
Page 3 of Section F of the Christchurch Press, published on Saturday 31 January 2015.
Page 9 of Section E of the Christchurch Press, published on Saturday 31 January 2015.
Page 11 of Section A of the Christchurch Press, published on Saturday 31 January 2015.
Page 12 of Section A of the Christchurch Press, published on Saturday 31 January 2015.
Page 9 of Section A of the Christchurch Press, published on Saturday 31 January 2015.
Page 13 of Section A of the Christchurch Press, published on Saturday 31 January 2015.
Page 3 of Section D of the Christchurch Press, published on Saturday 31 January 2015.
Page 18 of Section A of the Christchurch Press, published on Saturday 31 January 2015.