An electronic copy of the October 2012 edition of the Diamond Harbour Herald.
An electronic copy of the April 2012 edition of the Diamond Harbour Herald.
An electronic copy of the September 2012 edition of the Diamond Harbour Herald.
An electronic copy of the May 2012 edition of the Diamond Harbour Herald.
An electronic copy of the June 2012 edition of the Diamond Harbour Herald.
An electronic copy of the March 2012 edition of the Diamond Harbour Herald.
An electronic copy of the July 2012 edition of the Diamond Harbour Herald.
An electronic copy of the July 2012 edition of the Diamond Harbour Herald.
An electronic copy of the December 2012 edition of the Diamond Harbour Herald.
An electronic copy of the August 2012 edition of the Diamond Harbour Herald.
An electronic copy of the February 2012 edition of the Diamond Harbour Herald.
Diamond Harbour, viewed across Lyttelton Harbour from Reserve Terrace.
Diamond Harbour photographed from Reserve Terrace, across the Lyttelton Harbour.
Diamond Harbour photographed from Reserve Terrace, across the Lyttelton Harbour.
Diamond Harbour photographed from Reserve Terrace, across the Lyttelton Harbour.
Due to the 7.1 earthquake on 4th September 2010 and then the following earthquakes Godley House has suffered severe damage. Godley house was built in 1880 by Harvey Hawkins - see www.godleyhouse.co.nz/
There is strong consensus in the civil defence and emergency management literature that public participation is essential for a 'good' recovery. However, there is a paucity of research detailing how this community-led planning should be carried out in the real world. There are few processes or timelines for communities to follow when wanting to plan for themselves, nor is there a great deal of advice for communities who want to plan for their own recovery. In short, despite this consensus that community involvement is desireable, there is very little information available as to the nature of this involvement or how communities might facilitate this. It is simply assumed that communities are willing and able to participate in the recovery process and that recovery authorities will welcome, encourage, and enable this participation. This is not always the case, and the result is that community groups can be left feeling lost and ineffective when trying to plan for their own recovery. In attempting to address this gap, my study contributes to a better understanding of community involvement in recovery planning, based on research with on particular a community group (SPRIG), who has undertaken their own form of community-led planning in a post-disaster environment. Through group observations and in-depth interviews with members of SPRIG, I was able to identify various roles for such groups in the post-disaster recovery process. My research also contributes to an enhanced understanding of the process a community group might follow to implement their own form of post-disaster recovery planning, with the main point being that any planning should be done side by side with local authorities. Finally, I discovered that a community group will face organisational, community and institutional challenges when trying to plan for their area; however, despite these challenges, opportunities exist, such as the chance to build a better future.