Christchurch Press 2 March 2013: Section D, Page 7
Articles, UC QuakeStudies
Page 7 of Section D of the Christchurch Press, published on Saturday 2 March 2013.
Page 7 of Section D of the Christchurch Press, published on Saturday 2 March 2013.
Page 2 of Section D of the Christchurch Press, published on Saturday 7 December 2013.
Page 2 of Section D of the Christchurch Press, published on Wednesday 7 August 2013.
Page 2 of Section D of the Christchurch Press, published on Saturday 7 September 2013.
Page 7 of Section D of the Christchurch Press, published on Saturday 2 February 2013.
The objective of this study is to examine the influence of near-fault motions on liquefaction triggering in Christchurch and neighboring towns during the 2010-2011 Canterbury earthquake sequence (CES). The CES began with the 4 September 2010, Mw7.1 Darfield earthquake and included up to ten events that triggered liquefaction. However, most notably, widespread liquefaction was induced by the Darfield earthquake and the Mw6.2, 22 February 2011 Christchurch earthquake. Of particular relevance to this study is the forward directivity effects that were prevalent in the motions recorded during the Darfield earthquake, and to a much lesser extent, during the Christchurch earthquake. A 2D variant of the Richart-Newmark fatigue theory was used to compute the equivalent number of cycles (neq) for the ground motions, where volumetric strain was used as the damage metric. This study is unique because it considers the contribution and phasing of both the fault-normal and fault-parallel components of motion on neq and the magnitude scaling factor (MSF). It was found that when the fault-normal and fault-parallel motions were treated individually, the former yielded a lower neq than the latter. Additionally, when the combined effects of fault-normal and fault-parallel components were considered, it was found that the MSF were higher than those commonly used. This implies that motions containing near-fault effects are less demanding on the soil than motions that do not. This may be one of several factors that resulted in less severe liquefaction occurring during the Darfield earthquake than the Christchurch earthquake.
Earthquake damage. As a result of the September 2010 earthquake, with further damage from the February 2011 event.