A story submitted by Barry Ramsay to the QuakeStories website.
A story submitted by Kate Bennett to the QuakeStories website.
A story submitted by Anna Cotterrell to the QuakeStories website.
A story submitted by Kathryn to the QuakeStories website.
A story submitted by Kerri to the QuakeStories website.
A story submitted by Maureen Wootton to the QuakeStories website.
A story submitted by Bill Thew to the QuakeStories website.
A story submitted by Francis Ganderton to the QuakeStories website.
A story submitted by Anonymous to the QuakeStories website.
A story submitted by Lucinda to the QuakeStories website.
A story submitted by Allie to the QuakeStories website.
A story submitted by Marian Parkin to the QuakeStories website.
A story submitted by Lisa Gibson to the QuakeStories website.
Text at the top of the cartoon reads 'NZ city strengthening?' A whole city enclosed in a glass dome and balanced on huge springs intended to make it earthquake resistant rocks as another aftershock hits. Context - Two earthquakes and hundreds of aftershocks have hit Christchurch, the first on 4 September 2010 and a second more devastating one on 22 February 2011. There has been great emphasis on making heritage buildings that are rebuilt and all new buildings earthquake resistant. The example in the cartoon is perhaps a Springs-with-damper base isolator. Quantity: 1 digital cartoon(s).
This dissertation explores the advocacy for the Christchurch Town Hall that occurred in 2012-2015 after the Canterbury Earthquakes. It frames this advocacy as an instance of collective-action community participation in a heritage decision, and explores the types of heritage values it expressed, particularly social values. The analysis contextualises the advocacy in post-quake Christchurch, and considers its relationship with other developments in local politics, heritage advocacy, and urban activism. In doing so, this dissertation considers how collective action operates as a form of public participation, and the practical implications for understanding and recognising social value. This research draws on studies of practices that underpin social value recognition in formal heritage management. Social value is held by communities outside institutions. Engaging with communities enables institutions to explore the values of specific places, and to realise the potential of activating local connections with heritage places. Such projects can be seen as participatory practices. However, these processes require skills and resources, and may not be appropriate for all places, communities and institutions. However, literature has understudied collective action as a form of community participation in heritage management. All participation processes have nuances of communities, processes, and context, and this dissertation analyses these in one case. The research specifically asked what heritage values (especially social values) were expressed through collective action, what the relationship was with the participation processes, communities, and wider situation that produced them, and the impact on institutional rhetoric and decisions. The research analysed values expressed in representations made to council in support of the Town Hall. It also used documentary sources and interviews with key informants to analyse the advocacy and decision-making processes and their relationships with the wider context and other grassroots activities. The analysis concluded that the values expressed intertwined social and professional values. They were related to the communities and circumstance that produced them, as an advocacy campaign for a civic heritage building from a Western architectural tradition. The advocacy value arguments were one of several factors that impacted the decision. They have had a lasting impact on rhetoric around the Town Hall, as was a heritage-making practice in its own right. This dissertation makes a number of contributions to the discussion of social value and community in heritage. It suggests connections between advocacy and participation perspectives in heritage. It recommends consideration of nuances of communities, context, and place meanings when using heritage advocacy campaigns as evidence of social value. It adds to the literature on heritage advocacy, and offers a focused analysis of one of many heritage debates that occurred in post-quake Christchurch. Ultimately, it encourages practice to actively integrate social and community values and to develop self-reflexive engagement and valuation processes. Despite inherent challenges, participatory processes offer opportunities to diversify understandings of value, co-produce heritage meanings with communities, and empower citizens in democratic processes around the places they live with and love.
A digitally manipulated image of 'Save Our Cathedral' ribbons hanging from a cordon fence near Latimer Square.
The "Lyttelton Harbour Review" newsletter for 27 May 2013, produced by the Lyttelton Harbour Information Centre.
The "Lyttelton Review" newsletter for 6 August 2012, produced by the Lyttelton Harbour Information Centre.
A copy of the CanCERN online newsletter published on 16 December 2011
Transcript of participant number LY193's earthquake story, captured by the UC QuakeBox project.
A photograph submitted by Matt Pickering to the QuakeStories website. The description reads, "The army on hand, helping prepare for the demolition of the Strategy Building".
A story submitted by Alasdair Wright to the QuakeStories website.
A story submitted by Brenda Greene to the QuakeStories website.
A story submitted by Brenda Greene to the QuakeStories website.
A story submitted by Archie Thomson to the QuakeStories website.
A story submitted by Ricki hinch to the QuakeStories website.
A story submitted by Jane McCulla to the QuakeStories website.
A story submitted by Marjorie Weaver to the QuakeStories website.
A story submitted by Julie to the QuakeStories website.
A story submitted by Anonymous to the QuakeStories website.