A photograph of a piece of masonry removed from the Cranmer Centre and placed on the ground in front.
A photograph of a piece of masonry removed from the Cranmer Centre and placed on the ground in front.
A photograph of nails in a beam removed from the Cranmer Centre and placed on the ground in front.
The ground literally opened up! On the previously unknown faultline along which the Saturday 4 September 2010 earthquake originated.
The ground literally opened up! On the previously unknown faultline along which the Saturday 4 September 2010 earthquake originated.
The ground literally opened up! On the previously unknown faultline along which the Saturday 4 September 2010 earthquake originated.
The ground literally opened up! On the previously unknown faultline along which the Saturday 4 September 2010 earthquake originated.
A photograph of a detail of a beam removed from the Cranmer Centre and placed on the ground in front.
A photograph of a detail of a beam removed from the Cranmer Centre and placed on the ground in front.
A photograph of a beam removed from the roof of the Cranmer Centre and placed on the ground in front.
A photograph of the beams removed from the roof of the Cranmer Centre and placed on the ground in front.
A photograph of the beams removed from the roof of the Cranmer Centre and placed on the ground in front.
A photograph of the beams removed from the roof of the Cranmer Centre and placed on the ground in front.
Photograph captioned by Fairfax, "Halswell School Principal Bruce Topham looks at liquefaction on the school ground after the latest quake".
A photograph of the beams removed from the roof of the Cranmer Centre and placed on the ground in front.
A photograph of a panel removed from the roof of the Cranmer Centre and placed on the ground in front.
The former Government Life building in Cathedral Square. A couple of windows have been broken and a window on the ground floor has been boarded up.
The back of a damaged building on Madras Street. The awning from Bains of Madras Street sits on the ground beside the cordon fencing.
A sign on the ground next to a exposed brick wall outside the former site for Piko Wholefoods. It reads "Piko. 248 Stanmore. Open".
8-pages Special devices can be used to minimize structural damage by energy dissipation or seismic isolation. This research considers High Force-to-Volume (HF2V), Symmetric Friction Connection (SFC), Asymmetric Friction Connection (AFC) and Linear-Elastic Isolators (LEI). Device architectures connecting column-to-deck and ground-to-deck are also compared. Bridge columns are assumed to remain elastic. Performance of bridge columns (peak and residual displacement) under 20 probabilistically scaled ground motions is assessed in spectral analysis (0.1-5.0sec) using reduction factors compared to a fixed, no-device case. Energy dissipating devices have minimum column displacement reduction factors when placed between the column and the deck for rigid connection system periods up to ~2.5s. Above that fundamental period, dissipating devices connecting ground-to-deck provide the optimum configuration. Residual displacements obtained when the energy dissipators are placed between the column and the deck are larger than those of the ground to deck case for periods below ~3.7s. Above this 3.7s, frictional dissipators in the column to deck case are more efficient, but HF2V devices connecting ground to deck remain as the best alternative with no residual displacements. The performance curves obtained in this research provide design guidelines for the best device and configuration applicable to a broad range of bridge structures.
A photograph of detail of a piece of masonry removed from the Cranmer Centre and placed on the ground in front.
A photograph of detail of a piece of masonry removed from the Cranmer Centre and placed on the ground in front.
A photograph a detail of a piece of masonry removed from the Cranmer Centre and placed on the ground in front.
A photograph a detail of a piece of masonry removed from the Cranmer Centre and placed on the ground in front.
A photograph a detail of a piece of masonry removed from the Cranmer Centre and placed on the ground in front.
This study investigates the uncertainty of simulated earthquake ground motions for smallmagnitude events (Mw 3.5 – 5) in Canterbury, New Zealand. 148 events were simulated with specified uncertainties in: event magnitude, hypocentre location, focal mechanism, high frequency rupture velocity, Brune stress parameter, the site 30-m time-averaged shear wave velocity (Vs30), anelastic attenuation (Q) and high frequency path duration. In order to capture these uncertainties, 25 realisations for each event were generated using the Graves and Pitarka (2015) hybrid broadband simulation approach. Monte-Carlo realisations were drawn from distributions for each uncertainty, to generate a suite of simulation realisations for each event and site. The fit of the multiple simulation realisations to observations were assessed using linear mixed effects regression to generate the systematic source, path and site effects components across all ground motion intensity measure residuals. Findings show that additional uncertainties are required in each of the three source, path, and site components, however the level of output uncertainty is promising considering the input uncertainties included.
The Prime Minister, has promised people in Canterbury they will know next Wednesday whether they can rebuild on ground badly damaged by this month's earthquake.
The tower on the Great Hall at the Arts Centre has recently been lowered to the ground for safety - and decorated for Christmas. It must be the most unusual Christmas tree ever.
A photograph of the Cranmer Centre. Below a collection of masonry has been removed from the building and placed on the ground.
A photograph of detail of a panel removed from the roof of the Cranmer Centre and placed on the ground in front.