A story submitted by Joshua Daglish to the QuakeStories website.
A story submitted by Bettina to the QuakeStories website.
A story submitted by Summer to the QuakeStories website.
A story submitted by Madeh Mary to the QuakeStories website.
A story submitted by Sue Stopford to the QuakeStories website.
A story submitted by Sue Stopford to the QuakeStories website.
A story submitted by Anonymous to the QuakeStories website.
A story submitted by Louisa to the QuakeStories website.
A story submitted by Helen to the QuakeStories website.
A letter written by Roz Johnson to family members overseas.
A story submitted by Irene to the QuakeStories website.
Drywalls are the typical infill or partitions used in new structures. They are usually located within structural frames and/or between upper and lower floor slabs in buildings. Due to the materials used in their construction, unlike masonry blocks, they can be considered as light non-structural infill/partition walls. These types of walls are especially popular in New Zealand and the USA. In spite of their popularity, little is known about their in-plane cyclic behaviour when infilled within a structural frame. The cause of this lack of knowledge can be attributed to the typical assumption that they are weak non-structural elements and are not expected to interact with the surrounding structural system significantly. However, recent earthquakes have repeatedly shown that drywalls interact with the structure and suffer severe damage at very low drift levels. In this paper, experimental test results of two typical drywall types (steel and timber framed) are reported in order to gather further information on; i) their reverse cyclic behaviour, ii) inter-storey drift levels at which they suffer different levels of damage, iii) the level of interaction with the surrounding structural frame system. The drywall specimens were tested using quasi-static reverse cyclic testing protocols within a full scale precast RC frame at the Structures Laboratory of the University of Canterbury.
A story submitted by Emma to the QuakeStories website.
A story submitted by Anonymous to the QuakeStories website.
A story submitted by Ginny Larsen to the QuakeStories website.
A story submitted by samuel to the QuakeStories website.
A story submitted by Matthew F to the QuakeStories website.
A story submitted by Jayne to the QuakeStories website.
A story submitted by Andy R to the QuakeStories website.
A story submitted by J. C. to the QuakeStories website.
A story submitted by Jenny to the QuakeStories website.
A story submitted by Anonymous to the QuakeStories website.
A story submitted by Anonymous to the QuakeStories website.
A story submitted by Glen Harris to the QuakeStories website.
A story submitted by Anonymous to the QuakeStories website.
A story submitted by Anonymous to the QuakeStories website.
A story submitted by Lawrence Wootton to the QuakeStories website.
A story submitted by Philip to the QuakeStories website.
A story submitted by Anonymous to the QuakeStories website.
A story submitted by Mark Edmondston to the QuakeStories website.