Page 6 of Section B of the Christchurch Press, published on Friday 17 June 2011.
Page 7 of Section B of the Christchurch Press, published on Friday 17 June 2011.
Page 24 of Section B of the Christchurch Press, published on Saturday 31 December 2011.
Page 3 of Section B of the Christchurch Press, published on Friday 15 June 2012.
Page 5 of Section B of the Christchurch Press, published on Friday 15 June 2012.
Page 4 of Section B of the Christchurch Press, published on Friday 15 June 2012.
Page 10 of Section B of the Christchurch Press, published on Friday 10 September 2010.
Page 4 of Section B of the Christchurch Press, published on Saturday 5 March 2011.
An entry from Deb Robertson's blog for 2 May 2011 entitled, "B is for broken...".
Critical infrastructure networks are highly relied on by society such that any disruption to service can have major social and economic implications. Furthermore, these networks are becoming increasingly dependent on each other for normal operation such that an outage or asset failure in one system can easily propagate and cascade across others resulting in widespread disruptions in terms of both magnitude and spatial reach. It is the vulnerability of these networks to disruptions and the corresponding complexities in recovery processes which provide direction to this research. This thesis comprises studies contributing to two areas (i) the modelling of national scale in-terdependent infrastructure systems undergoing major disruptions, and (ii) the tracking and quantification of infrastructure network recovery trajectories following major disruptions. Firstly, methods are presented for identifying nationally significant systemic vulnerabilities and incorporating expert knowledge into the quantification of infrastructure interdependency mod-elling and simulation. With application to the interdependent infrastructures networks across New Zealand, the magnitudes and spatial extents of disruption are investigated. Results high-light the importance in considering interdependencies when assessing disruptive risks and vul-nerabilities in disaster planning applications and prioritising investment decisions for enhancing resilience of national networks. Infrastructure dependencies are further studied in the context of recovery from major disruptions through the analysis of curves measuring network functionality over time. Continued studies into the properties of recovery curves across a database of global natural disasters produce statistical models for predicting the trajectory and expected recovery times. Finally, the use of connectivity based metrics for quantifying infrastructure system functionality during recovery are considered with a case study application to the Christchurch Earthquake (February 22, 2011) wastewater network response.
A facsimile of an architectural drawing of St. Elmo's Courts. Architect: B. J. Ager
The University of Canterbury Dept. of Chemistry has weathered the Canterbury Earthquake of September 4, 2010 very well due to a combination of good luck, good planning and dedicated effort. We owe a great deal to university Emergency Response Team and Facilities Management Personnel. The overall emergency preparedness of the university was tested to a degree far beyond anything else in its history and shown to be well up to scratch. A strong cooperative relationship between the pan-campus controlling body and the departmental response teams greatly facilitated our efforts. Information and assistance was provided promptly, as and when we needed it without unnecessary bureaucratic overheads. At the departmental level we are indebted to the technical staff who implemented the invaluable pre-quake mitigation measures and carried the majority of the post-quake clean-up workload. These people put aside their personal concerns and anxieties at a time when magnitude-5 aftershocks were still a regular occurrence.
Prior to the devastating 2010 and 2011 earthquakes in Christchurch, New Zealand, the University of Canterbury (UC) was renowned for its graduates’ academic preparation and its staff’s research outputs. The town/gown relationship was aloof and strained due to UC’s move from the CBD in the 1970s and students being seen as troublemakers. Despite its vision of people prepared to make a difference, the University’s students and staff were not seen as making a difference in the local community or as being engaged citizens. This changed when over 9,000 UC students mobilized themselves into the Student Volunteer Army to provide immediate relief across Christchurch following the four major quakes of 2010 and 2011. Suddenly, UC students were seen as saviors, not miscreants and a focus on citizenship education as part of the University’s strategic direction began to take shape. Based on qualitative and quantitative research conducted at UC over the past four years, this interactive presentation will highlight the findings, conclusions, and implications of how the University has been transformed into a recognized, international leader in citizenship education. By integrating students’ community service into their academic studies, the University has changed its persona while students have gained academically, civically, and personally.
Pages 10 and 11 of section B of the Christchurch Press, published on Thursday 9 September 2010.
Pages 4 and 5 of Section B of the Christchurch Press, published on Saturday 25 October 2014.
Pages 8 and 9 of Section B of the Christchurch Press, published on Tuesday 25 October 2011.
Pages 4 and 5 of Section B of the Christchurch Press, published on Saturday 22 October 2011.
Pages 14 and 15 of Section B of the Christchurch Press, published on Monday 26 December 2011.
Page 15 of Section B of the Christchurch edition of the Christchurch Press, published on Friday 24 September 2010.
Page 22 of Section B of the Christchurch edition of the Christchurch Press, published on Wednesday 22 December 2010.
Page 11 of Section B of the Christchurch edition of the Christchurch Press, published on Tuesday 7 December 2010.
Page 12 of Section B of the Christchurch edition of the Christchurch Press, published on Thursday 24 May 2012.
Page 19 of Section B of the Christchurch edition of the Christchurch Press, published on Friday 24 September 2010.
Page 21 of Section B of the Christchurch edition of the Christchurch Press, published on Thursday 16 December 2010.
Page 11 of Section B of the Christchurch edition of the Christchurch Press, published on Monday 20 December 2010.
Page 12 of Section B of the Christchurch edition of the Christchurch Press, published on Friday 17 December 2010.
Page 11 of Section B of the Christchurch edition of the Christchurch Press, published on Monday 6 December 2010.
Page 1 of Section B of the Christchurch edition of the Christchurch Press, published on Wednesday 8 December 2010.
Page 15 of Section B of the Christchurch edition of the Christchurch Press, published on Friday 7 October 2011.
Page 9 of Section B of the Christchurch edition of the Christchurch Press, published on Monday 30 April 2012.