A two-storey house where the ground level walls have been boarded up.
A broken window at ground level has building rubble behind it, some of which has been pushed out through the broken glass. The photographer comments, "The alternate title is 'Under Pressure'. A bulldozer must have pushed earthquake debris up against the internal wall not realising there was a glass reinforced window at ground level".
The base of the tower on the right of this picture has sunk so that the lower course of bricks have disappeared below ground level. The sand you can see is what came bubbling up out of the ground due to liquifaction.
In this paper, we perform hybrid broadband (0-10 Hz) ground motion simulations for the ten most significant events (Mw 4.7-7.1) in the 2010-2011 Canterbury earthquake sequence. Taking advantage of having repeated recordings at same stations, we validate our simulations using both recordings and an empirically-developed ground motion prediction equation (GMPE). The simulation clearly captures the sedimentary basin amplification and the rupture directivity effects. Quantitative comparisons of the simulations with both recordings and the GMPE, as well as analyses of the total residuals (indicating model bias) show that simulations perform better than the empirical GMPE, especially for long period. To scrutinize the ground motion variability, we partitioned the total residuals into different components. The total residual appears to be unbiased, and the use of a 3D velocity structure reduces the long period systematic bias particularly for stations located close to the Banks Peninsula volcanic area.
A crane lifting the roof of one of the temporary buildings off the ground.
Ground heaving on the faultline from which the Saturday 4 September 2010 earthquake originated.
Residents watching two arborists working, one on the tree and one working on the ground.
Radio New Zealand reporter Jessica Horne is at her home in Christchurch, which has sunken into the ground.
Build up of liquefaction that has seeped from the ground onto the road and footpath.
Since the early 1980s seismic hazard assessment in New Zealand has been based on Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Analysis (PSHA). The most recent version of the New Zealand National Seismic Hazard Model, a PSHA model, was published by Stirling et al, in 2012. This model follows standard PSHA principals and combines a nation-wide model of active faults with a gridded point-source model based on the earthquake catalogue since 1840. These models are coupled with the ground-motion prediction equation of McVerry et al (2006). Additionally, we have developed a time-dependent clustering-based PSHA model for the Canterbury region (Gerstenberger et al, 2014) in response to the Canterbury earthquake sequence. We are now in the process of revising that national model. In this process we are investigating several of the fundamental assumptions in traditional PSHA and in how we modelled hazard in the past. For this project, we have three main focuses: 1) how do we design an optimal combination of multiple sources of information to produce the best forecast of earthquake rates in the next 50 years: can we improve upon a simple hybrid of fault sources and background sources, and can we better handle the uncertainties in the data and models (e.g., fault segmentation, frequency-magnitude distributions, time-dependence & clustering, low strain-rate areas, and subduction zone modelling)? 2) developing revised and new ground-motion predictions models including better capturing of epistemic uncertainty – a key focus in this work is developing a new strong ground motion catalogue for model development; and 3) how can we best quantify if changes we have made in our modelling are truly improvements? Throughout this process we are working toward incorporating numerical modelling results from physics based synthetic seismicity and ground-motion models.
A photograph of masonry removed from the Cranmer Centre and placed on the ground in front.
A photograph of pipes lifted out of the ground at a petrol station in New Brighton.
A photograph of masonry removed from the Cranmer Centre and placed on the ground in front.
Damage to the Knox Church. On the ground is the word 'Danger' spray-painted on the footpath.
Damage to an apartment complex on Durham Street. The building has collapsed on the ground floor level.
Damage to an apartment complex on Durham Street. The building has collapsed on the ground floor level.
A major hazard accompanying earthquake shaking in areas of steep topography is the detachment of rocks from bedrock outcrops that subsequently slide, roll, or bounce downslope (i.e. rockfalls). The 2010-2011 Canterbury earthquake sequence caused recurrent and severe rockfall in parts of southern Christchurch. Coseismic rockfall caused five fatalities and significant infrastructural damage during the 2011 Mw 6.2 Christchurch earthquake. Here we examine a rockfall site in southern Christchurch in detail using geomorphic mapping, lidar analysis, geochronology (cosmogenic 3He dating, radiocarbon dating, optically stimulated luminescence (OSL) from quartz, infrared stimulated luminescence from K-feldspar), numerical modeling of rockfall boulder trajectories, and ground motion prediction equations (GMPEs). Rocks fell from the source cliff only in earthquakes with interpolated peak ground velocities exceeding ~10 cm/s; hundreds of smaller earthquakes did not produce rockfall. On the basis of empirical observations, GMPEs and age chronologies we attribute paleo-rockfalls to strong shaking in prehistoric earthquakes. We conclude that earthquake shaking of comparable intensity to the strongest contemporary earthquakes in Christchurch last occurred at this site approximately 5000 to 7000 years ago, and that in some settings, rockfall deposits provide useful proxies for past strong ground motions.
Gold Awards, presented to Thomas Young (from Christchurch), Student volunteer ground and logistical operations. With Prime Minister John Key.
Gold Awards, presented to Christopher Duncan (from Darfield), Student volunteer ground and logistical operations. With Prime Minister John Key.
Gold Awards, presented to Christopher Duncan (from Darfield), Student volunteer ground and logistical operation. With Prime Minister John Key.
Misko Cubrinovski is interested how the ground and the structures on - and in - it behave during an earthquake.
Sticky Fingers Restaurant & Bar, on the ground floor of the Clarendon Tower, seen from across from the Avon river.
A construction site where some ground foundation has been laid down. In the background is a damaged brick property.
The ground of The Pump House in Linwood. A pile of brick sits next to the damage brick wall.
Workers digging up the ground as part of the construction of the Oval Village, temporary classrooms on Campus.
A crane lifting the roof of one of the temporary buildings off the ground in the Ilam Oval.
A photograph of a beam removed from the Cranmer Centre and placed on the ground in front.
A photograph of a beam removed from the Cranmer Centre and placed on the ground in front.
A photograph of a beam removed from the Cranmer Centre and placed on the ground in front.
A photograph of a beam removed from the Cranmer Centre and placed on the ground in front.