A document describing the early warning system to alert team members of ground and structural movement at the Arch.
A magazine article which outlines the observations of engineers working on SCIRT retaining wall and ground improvement projects.
Photos taken in Lyttelton following the February 22 earthquake. File ref: CCL-2011-03-05-After-The-Earthquake-P1110507 From the collection of Christchurch City Libraries
This paper examines the consistency of seismicity and ground motion models, used for seismic hazard analysis in New Zealand, with the observations in the Canterbury earthquakes. An overview is first given of seismicity and ground motion modelling as inputs of probabilistic seismic hazard analysis, whose results form the basis for elastic response spectra in NZS1170.5:2004. The magnitude of earthquakes in the Canterbury earthquake sequence are adequately allowed for in the current NZ seismicity model, however the consideration of ‘background’ earthquakes as point sources at a minimum depth of 10km results in up to a 60% underestimation of the ground motions that such events produce. The ground motion model used in conventional NZ seismic hazard analysis is shown to provide biased predictions of response spectra (over-prediction near T=0.2s , and under-predictions at moderate-to-large vibration periods). Improved ground motion prediction can be achieved using more recent NZ-specific models.
Photos taken in Lyttelton showing the demolition at various locations following the February 22 earthquake. File reference: CCL-2011-05-20-Lyttelton-Demolition-P1120473 From the collection of Christchurch City Libraries.
Photo inside ground floor of Records & Archives of Pegasus Building taken by James Thompson, 5 September 2010.
Photo inside ground floor of Records & Archives of Pegasus Building taken by James Thompson, 5 September 2010.
Photo inside ground floor of Records & Archives of Pegasus Building taken by James Thompson, 5 September 2010.
Photo inside ground floor of Records & Archives of Pegasus Building taken by James Thompson, 5 September 2010.
Photo inside of Publications of Ground Floor of Pegasus Building taken by Angela Dean, 9 June 2011.
Photo inside of Reception of Ground Floor of Pegasus Building taken by Angela Dean, 9 June 2011.
Photo inside of Reception of Ground Floor of Pegasus Building taken by Angela Dean, 9 June 2011.
Photo inside of Reception of Ground Floor of Pegasus Building taken by Angela Dean, 9 June 2011.
Photo inside of Reception of Ground Floor of Pegasus Building taken by Angela Dean, 9 June 2011.
The 2010-2011 Canterbury earthquake sequence was extremely damaging to structures in Christchurch and continues to have a large economic and social impact on the city and surrounding regions. In addition to strong ground shaking (Bradley and Cubrinovski 2011 SRL; Bradley 2012 SDEE), extensive liquefaction was observed, particularly in the 4 September 2010 Darfield earthquake and the 22 February 2011 Christchurch earthquake (Cubrinovski et al. 2010 BNZSEE; 2011 SRL). Large observed vertical ground motion amplitudes were recorded in the events in this sequence, with vertical peak ground accelerations of over 2.2g being observed at the Heathcote Valley Primary School during the Christchurch earthquake, and numerous other vertical motions exceeding 1.0g (Bradley and Cubrinovski 2011 SRL; Bradley 2012 SDEE; Fry et al 2011 SRL). Vertical peak ground accelerations of over 1.2g were observed in the Darfield earthquake.
© 2017 The Royal Society of New Zealand. This paper discusses simulated ground motion intensity, and its underlying modelling assumptions, for great earthquakes on the Alpine Fault. The simulations utilise the latest understanding of wave propagation physics, kinematic earthquake rupture descriptions and the three-dimensional nature of the Earth's crust in the South Island of New Zealand. The effect of hypocentre location is explicitly examined, which is found to lead to significant differences in ground motion intensities (quantified in the form of peak ground velocity, PGV) over the northern half and southwest of the South Island. Comparison with previously adopted empirical ground motion models also illustrates that the simulations, which explicitly model rupture directivity and basin-generated surface waves, lead to notably larger PGV amplitudes than the empirical predictions in the northern half of the South Island and Canterbury. The simulations performed in this paper have been adopted, as one possible ground motion prediction, in the ‘Project AF8’ Civil Defence Emergency Management exercise scenario. The similarity of the modelled ground motion features with those observed in recent worldwide earthquakes as well as similar simulations in other regions, and the notably higher simulated amplitudes than those from empirical predictions, may warrant a re-examination of regional impact assessments for major Alpine Fault earthquakes.
Volunteers at the Lyttelton Petanque Club working bee.
The wall alongside the Lyttelton Petanque Club.
Volunteers building the petanque pitch at the Lyttelton Petanque Club.
Ryan Renolds building the petanque pitch at the Lyttleton Petanque Club.
Volunteers building the petanque pitch at the Lyttelton Petanque Club.
Members of the Lyttelton community at the Lyttelton Petanque Club.
The Director of Gap Filler, Coralie Winn, at the opening of the Lyttelton Petanque Club.
Ryan Renolds from Gap Filler at the Lyttelton Petanque Club.
The sign outside the Lyttelton Petanque Club, reading, "Lyttelton Petanque Club est. 2011. Grand opening today 12pm, bring food to share, lonely pots plants welcome!".
Volunteers constructing the benches and petanque pitch at the Lyttelton Petanque Club.
Volunteers constructing the petanque pitch at the Lyttelton Petanque Club.
Volunteers paint tables at the Lyttelton Petanque Club.
Volunteers constructing benches at the Lyttelton Petanque Club.
A photograph of the demolition site of Queen Elizabeth II Park.