Search

found 199 results

Images for Bridge; more images...

Research papers, The University of Auckland Library

The region in and around Christchurch, encompassing Christchurch city and the Selwyn and Waimakariri districts, contains more than 800 road, rail, and pedestrian bridges. Most of these bridges are reinforced concrete, symmetric, and have small to moderate spans (15–25 m). The 22 February 2011 moment magnitude (Mw) 6.2 Christchurch earthquake induced high levels of localized ground shaking (Bradley and Cubrinovski 2011, page 853 of this issue; Guidotti et al. 2011, page 767 of this issue; Smyrou et al. 2011, page 882 of this issue), with damage to bridges mainly confined to the central and eastern parts of Christchurch. Liquefaction was evident over much of this part of the city, with lateral spreading affecting bridges spanning both the Avon and Heathcote rivers.

Images, UC QuakeStudies

A digitally manipulated photograph of the badly twisted Medway Street footbridge. The photographer comments, "This bridge over the Avon River in Christchurch, New Zealand has been left in place since the first major earthquake back in September 2010. Graffiti artists or taggers are still leaving their marks on it even though it is nearly twisted at 90 degrees at one point".

Images, eqnz.chch.2010

One Month after the Christchurch Earthquake. The mangled remains of the pedestrian bridge over the river Avon Twitter | Facebook | My ...

Images, UC QuakeStudies

A cycle-lane sign submerged in water. The photographer comments, "During the Christchurch earthquake this sign must have dropped off of the pedestrian bridge above and landed straight down into the Avon River".

Research papers, University of Canterbury Library

This paper presents the probabilistic seismic performance and loss assessment of an actual bridge– foundation–soil system, the Fitzgerald Avenue twin bridges in Christchurch, New Zealand. A two-dimensional finite element model of the longitudinal direction of the system is modelled using advanced soil and structural constitutive models. Ground motions at multiple levels of intensity are selected based on the seismic hazard deaggregation at the site. Based on rigorous examination of several deterministic analyses, engineering demand parameters (EDP’s), which capture the global and local demand, and consequent damage to the bridge and foundation are determined. A probabilistic seismic loss assessment of the structure considering both direct repair and loss of functionality consequences was performed to holistically assess the seismi risk of the system. It was found that the non-horizontal stratification of the soils, liquefaction, and soil–structure interaction had pronounced effects on the seismic demand distribution of the bridge components, of which the north abutment piles and central pier were critical in the systems seismic performance. The consequences due to loss of functionality of the bridge during repair were significantly larger than the direct repair costs, with over a 2% in 50 year probability of the total loss exceeding twice the book-value of the structure.

Research papers, University of Canterbury Library

8-pagesSpecial devices can be used to minimize structural damage by energy dissipation or seismic isolation. This research considers High Force-to-Volume (HF2V), Symmetric Friction Connection (SFC), Asymmetric Friction Connection (AFC) and Linear-Elastic Isolators (LEI). Device architectures connecting column-to-deck and ground-to-deck are also compared. Bridge columns are assumed to remain elastic. Performance of bridge columns (peak and residual displacement) under 20 probabilistically scaled ground motions is assessed in spectral analysis (0.1-5.0sec) using reduction factors compared to a fixed, no-device case. Energy dissipating devices have minimum column displacement reduction factors when placed between the column and the deck for rigid connection system periods up to ~2.5s. Above that fundamental period, dissipating devices connecting ground-to-deck provide the optimum configuration. Residual displacements obtained when the energy dissipators are placed between the column and the deck are larger than those of the ground to deck case for periods below ~3.7s. Above this 3.7s, frictional dissipators in the column to deck case are more efficient, but HF2V devices connecting ground to deck remain as the best alternative with no residual displacements. The performance curves obtained in this research provide design guidelines for the best device and configuration applicable to a broad range of bridge structures.