Work starts on the new student entertainment building in the USCA carpark.
Work starts on the new student entertainment building in the USCA carpark.
Designing a structure for higher- than-code seismic performance can result in significant economic and environmental benefits. This higher performance can be achieved using the principles of Performance-Based Design, in which engineers design structures to minimize the probabilistic lifecycle seismic impacts on a building. Although the concept of Performance-Based Design is not particularly new, the initial capital costs associated with designing structures for higher performance have historically hindered the widespread adoption of performance-based design practices. To overcome this roadblock, this research is focused on providing policy makers and stakeholders with evidence-based environmental incentives for designing structures in New Zealand for higher seismic performance. In the first phase of the research, the environmental impacts of demolitions in Christchurch following the Canterbury Earthquakes were quantified to demonstrate the environmental consequences of demolitions following seismic events. That is the focus here. A building data set consisting of 142 concrete buildings that were demolished following the earthquake was used to quantify the environmental impacts of the demolitions in terms of the embodied carbon and energy in the building materials. A reduced set of buildings was used to develop a material takeoff model to estimate material quantities in the entire building set, and a lifecycle assessment tool was used to calculate the embodied carbon and energy in the materials. The results revealed staggering impacts in terms of the embodied carbon and energy in the materials in the demolished buildings. Ongoing work is focused developing an environmental impact framework that incorporates all the complex factors (e.g. construction methodologies, repair methodologies (if applicable), demolition methodologies (if applicable), and waste management) that contribute to the environmental impacts of building repair and demolition following earthquakes.
Photograph captioned by BeckerFraserPhotos, "The new Press building on Gloucester Street at dusk. The central city red zone now has office workers and lights on".
Photograph captioned by Fairfax, "The new Christchurch Council building has suffered only cosmetic damage in the September 4th earthquake. Construction workers abseil down the side of the civic building checking for any damage".
Photograph captioned by Fairfax, "Owner of Real Groovy Records Paul Huggins outside their new premises in the old Penny Cycles building on the corner of Manchester and Tuam Streets after the earthquake damaged their old building".
Photograph captioned by Fairfax, "Owner of Real Groovy Records Paul Huggins outside their new premises in the old Penny Cycles building on the corner of Manchester and Tuam Streets after the earthquake damaged their old building".
Photograph captioned by Fairfax, "Owner of Real Groovy Records Paul Huggins outside their new premises in the old Penny Cycles building on the corner of Manchester and Tuam Streets after the earthquake damaged their old building".
A map showing the location of properties being purchased by the Crown for the frame and bus interchange.
Photograph captioned by Fairfax, "Kaiapoi businesses and retail outlets are struggling post-earthquake leading into Christmas. The Rooster cafe operating out of a prefab building after their building was demolished. Janeen Johnson bringing out coffee".
Photograph captioned by Fairfax, "The new Christchurch Council building has suffered only cosmetic damage in the September 4th earthquake. Construction workers abseil down the side of the civic building checking for any damage".
Photograph captioned by Fairfax, "The new Christchurch Council building has suffered only cosmetic damage in the September 4th earthquake. Construction workers abseil down the side of the civic building checking for any damage".
Page 6 of Section C of the Christchurch Press, published on Saturday 25 June 2011.
Page 2 of Section A of the Christchurch Press, published on Tuesday 30 August 2011.
Page 5 of Section A of the Christchurch Press, published on Wednesday 8 February 2012.
Page 2 of Section A of the Christchurch Press, published on Friday 29 June 2012.
Page 11 of Section A of the Christchurch Press, published on Thursday 25 October 2012.
Page 2 of Section A of the Christchurch Press, published on Saturday 10 November 2012.
Page 4 of Section A of the Christchurch Press, published on Tuesday 15 March 2011.
Page 1 of Section A of the Christchurch Press, published on Wednesday 3 July 2013.
Page 1 of Section A of the South Island edition of the Christchurch Press, published on Saturday 15 October 2011.
Page 3 of Section C of the Christchurch Press, published on Saturday 10 September 2011.
Page 4 of Section C of the Christchurch Press, published on Saturday 10 September 2011.
Page 6 of Section C of the Christchurch Press, published on Saturday 18 February 2012.
Page 2 of Section A of the Christchurch Press, published on Saturday 18 August 2012.
Page 5 of Section A of the Christchurch Press, published on Tuesday 31 July 2012.
Page 2 of Section A of the Christchurch Press, published on Thursday 16 August 2012.
Page 6 of Section A of the Christchurch Press, published on Tuesday 14 August 2012.
Page 3 of Section A of the Christchurch Press, published on Thursday 2 August 2012.
Page 9 of Section A of the Christchurch Press, published on Wednesday 22 February 2012.