A photograph of badly-damaged buildings on High Street.
Damaged buildings on Madras Street seen through cordon fencing.
A photograph of badly-damaged buildings on Bedford Row.
A photograph of badly-damaged buildings on Bedford Row.
A photograph of badly-damaged buildings on Bedford Row.
The "Lyttelton Harbour Review" newsletter for 13 May 2013, produced by the Lyttelton Harbour Information Centre.
A story submitted by Tayla Hodge to the QuakeStories website.
A story submitted by Anonymous to the QuakeStories website.
Transcript of Lorraine Savory's earthquake story, captured by the UC QuakeBox project.
An entry from Roz Johnson's blog for 09 June 2013 entitled, "Outer Spaces".
Christchurch earthquake events have raised questions on the adequacy of performance-based provisions in the current national building code. At present, in the building code the performance objectives are expressed in terms of safety and health criteria that could affect building occupants. In general, under the high intensity Christchurch events, buildings performed well in terms of life-safety (with a few exceptions) and it proved that the design practices adopted for those buildings could meet the performance objectives set by the building code. However, the damage incurred in those buildings resulted in unacceptably high economic loss. It is timely and necessary to revisit the objectives towards building performance in the building code and to include provisions for reducing economic implications in addition to the current requirements. Based on the observed performance of some buildings, a few specific issues in the current design practices that could have contributed to extensive damage have been identified and recommended for further research leading towards improved performance of structures. In particular, efforts towards innovative design/construction solutions with low-damage concepts are encouraged. New Zealand has been one of the leading countries in developing many innovative technologies. However, such technically advanced research findings usually face challenges towards implementation. Some of the reasons include: (i) lack of policy requirements; (iii) absence of demonstrated performance of new innovations to convince stakeholders; and (iv) non-existence of design guidelines. Such barriers significantly affect implementation of low damage construction and possible strategies to overcome those issues are discussed in this paper.
A damaged building on Bedford Row, seen from Cashel Street.
A damaged building on Bedford Row, seen from Cashel Street.
As a result of the 4 September 2010 Darfield earthquake and the more damaging 22 February 2011 Christchurch earthquake, considerable damage occurred to a significant number of buildings in Christchurch. The damage that occurred to the Christchurch Roman Catholic Cathedral of the Blessed Sacrament (commonly known as the Christchurch Basilica) as a result of the Canterbury earthquakes is reported, and the observed failure modes are identified. A previous strengthening intervention is outlined and the estimated capacity of the building is discussed. This strengthening was completed in 2004, and addressed the worst aspects of the building's seismic vulnerability. Urgent work was undertaken post-earthquake to secure parts of the building in order to limit damage and prevent collapse of unstable parts of the building. The approach taken for this securing is outlined, and the performance of the building and the previously installed earthquake strengthening intervention is evaluated.A key consideration throughout the project was the interaction between the structural securing requirements that were driven by the requirement to limit damage and mitigate hazards, and the heritage considerations. Lessons learnt from the strengthening that was carried out, the securing work undertaken, and the approach taken in making the building "safe" are discussed. Some conclusions are drawn with respect to the effectiveness of strengthening similar building types, and the approach taken to secure the building under active seismic conditions AM - Accepted Manuscript
An entry from Jennifer Middendorf's blog for 7 December 2013 entitled, "Time for some pretty sparkles".
An entry from Deb Robertson's blog for 11 July 2013 entitled, "Do you ever feel like you are walking through deep sand?".
An entry from Ruth Gardner's blog for 11 September 2013 entitled, "Arcadian Art".
A story submitted by Jane McCulla to the QuakeStories website.
An entry from Deb Robertson's blog for 31 May 2013 entitled, "One thousand days....".
An entry from Roz Johnson's blog for 5 August 2013 entitled, "Colourful Canterbury Brewery Building Going".
A photograph looking across a cleared building site between Lichfield Street and Bedford row to damaged buildings on Lichfield Street.
A photograph looking across a cleared building site between Lichfield Street and Bedford row to damaged buildings on Lichfield Street.
Broken windows and damaged cladding on the iStay building. Security fences have been placed around the building to restrict access.
A damaged building on Bedford Row, seen from Liverpool Street. The McKenzie and Willis building is visible in the background.
A photograph of the backs of badly-damaged High Street buildings.
A photograph of the back of badly-damaged High Street buildings.
Graffiti on the side of a damaged building on Lichfield Street
A photograph of the badly-damaged building at 128 Manchester Street.
A photograph of the back of badly-damaged High Street buildings.
A photograph of the back of badly-damaged High Street buildings.