The "Lyttelton Harbour Review" newsletter for 8 April 2013, produced by the Lyttelton Harbour Information Centre.
Christchurch earthquake events have raised questions on the adequacy of performance-based provisions in the current national building code. At present, in the building code the performance objectives are expressed in terms of safety and health criteria that could affect building occupants. In general, under the high intensity Christchurch events, buildings performed well in terms of life-safety (with a few exceptions) and it proved that the design practices adopted for those buildings could meet the performance objectives set by the building code. However, the damage incurred in those buildings resulted in unacceptably high economic loss. It is timely and necessary to revisit the objectives towards building performance in the building code and to include provisions for reducing economic implications in addition to the current requirements. Based on the observed performance of some buildings, a few specific issues in the current design practices that could have contributed to extensive damage have been identified and recommended for further research leading towards improved performance of structures. In particular, efforts towards innovative design/construction solutions with low-damage concepts are encouraged. New Zealand has been one of the leading countries in developing many innovative technologies. However, such technically advanced research findings usually face challenges towards implementation. Some of the reasons include: (i) lack of policy requirements; (iii) absence of demonstrated performance of new innovations to convince stakeholders; and (iv) non-existence of design guidelines. Such barriers significantly affect implementation of low damage construction and possible strategies to overcome those issues are discussed in this paper.
An entry from Ruth Gardner's blog for 11 July 2013 entitled, "Dangerous Demolition?".
An entry from Ruth Gardner's blog for 13 May 2013 entitled, "Restored Roadsigns".
An entry from Ruth Gardner's blog for 6 January 2013 entitled, "Squeaky Squatter?".
An entry from Ruth Gardner's blog for 10 March 2013 entitled, "Flattened Flats".
A damaged building on Bedford Row, seen from Cashel Street.
A damaged building on Bedford Row, seen from Cashel Street.
The "Lyttelton Harbour Review" newsletter for 13 May 2013, produced by the Lyttelton Harbour Information Centre.
A story submitted by Tayla Hodge to the QuakeStories website.
A story submitted by Anonymous to the QuakeStories website.
Transcript of Lorraine Savory's earthquake story, captured by the UC QuakeBox project.
An entry from Roz Johnson's blog for 09 June 2013 entitled, "Outer Spaces".
A photograph of the backs of badly-damaged High Street buildings.
A photograph of the back of badly-damaged High Street buildings.
Graffiti on the side of a damaged building on Lichfield Street
A photograph of the badly-damaged building at 128 Manchester Street.
A photograph of the back of badly-damaged High Street buildings.
A photograph of the back of badly-damaged High Street buildings.
A photograph of the badly-damaged building at 128 Manchester Street.
A photograph of the badly-damaged building at 128 Manchester Street.
A photograph of the badly-damaged building at 128 Manchester Street.
A photograph of the badly-damaged building at 128 Manchester Street.
A photograph of the badly-damaged building at 128 Manchester Street.
A photograph of the back of badly-damaged High Street buildings.
A photograph looking across a cleared building site between Lichfield Street and Bedford row to damaged buildings on Lichfield Street.
A photograph looking across a cleared building site between Lichfield Street and Bedford row to damaged buildings on Lichfield Street.
An entry from Ruth Gardner's blog for 11 September 2013 entitled, "Arcadian Art".
A story submitted by Jane McCulla to the QuakeStories website.
An entry from Deb Robertson's blog for 31 May 2013 entitled, "One thousand days....".