A scan of page 188 of the Townsend Telescope Visitors' Book.
A scan of page 55 of the Townsend Telescope Visitors' Book.
A scan of page 126 of the Townsend Telescope Visitors' Book.
A scan of page 137 of the Townsend Telescope Visitors' Book.
A scan of page 207 of the Townsend Telescope Visitors' Book.
A scan of page 237 of the Townsend Telescope Visitors' Book.
A scan of page 173 of the Townsend Telescope Visitors' Book.
A scan of page 87 of the Townsend Telescope Visitors' Book.
A scan of page 253 of the Townsend Telescope Visitors' Book.
A scan of page 251 of the Townsend Telescope Visitors' Book.
A scan of page 58 of the Townsend Telescope Visitors' Book.
A scan of page 172 of the Townsend Telescope Visitors' Book.
A scan of page 106 of the Townsend Telescope Visitors' Book.
A scan of page 209 of the Townsend Telescope Visitors' Book.
A scan of page 174 of the Townsend Telescope Visitors' Book.
A scan of page 249 of the Townsend Telescope Visitors' Book.
A scan of page 64 of the Townsend Telescope Visitors' Book.
A scan of page 258 of the Townsend Telescope Visitors' Book.
A scan of page 28 of the Townsend Telescope Visitors' Book.
A scan of page 145 of the Townsend Telescope Visitors' Book.
A scan of page 39 of the Townsend Telescope Visitors' Book.
A scan of page 157 of the Townsend Telescope Visitors' Book.
A scan of page 252 of the Townsend Telescope Visitors' Book.
Imagined landscapes find their form in utopian dreaming. As ideal places, utopias are set up according to the ideals of their designers. Inevitably, utopias become compromised when they move from the imaginary into the actual. Opportunities to create utopias rely largely on a blank slate, a landscape unimpeded by the inconveniences of existing occupation – or even topography. Christchurch has seen two utopian moments. The first was at the time of European settlement in the mid-nineteenth century, when imported ideals provided a model for a new city. The earthquakes of 2010 and 2011 provided a second point at which utopian dreaming spurred visions for the city. Christchurch’s earthquakes have provided a unique opportunity for a city to re-imagine itself. Yet, as is the fate for all imaginary places, reality got in the way.
New Zealand is one of the most highly urbanised countries in the world with well over 87 per cent of us living in 138 recognised urban centres, yet the number of people residing in inner city areas is proportionally very low. Householders have been exercising their preference for suburban or rural areas by opting for low density suburban environments. It is widely agreed that productivity and sustainability increase when people aggregate in the inner city, however there is a perceived trade-off between the density and liveability of an area. Achieving liveability in the inner city is concerned with reducing the pressures which emerge from higher population densities. Promoting inclusive societies, revitalising underutilised cityscapes, ensuring accessibility and fostering sense of place, are all elements essential to achieving liveable communities. The rebuild following the 2010 and 2011 Canterbury earthquakes provides Christchurch with an opportunity to shape a more environmentally sustainable, economically vibrant and liveable city. This research involves undertaking a case study of current inner city liveability measures and those provided for through the rebuild. A cross-case analysis with two of the world’s most liveable cities, Melbourne and Vancouver, exposes Christchurch’s potential shortcomings and reveals practical measures the city could implement in order to promote liveability.
A poster created by University of Canterbury students outlining their findings from examining SCIRT's approach to managing health and safety.
The world is constantly changing. Christchurch, New Zealand, has recently experienced drastic changes after earthquakes struck the city. The earthquakes caused the city to physically shake, and the land to sink in some places and rise in others. Now further change is forcast and parts of Christchurch could be under water by 2115 according to experts. Climate change induced sea level rise is recognised as a international issue with potential impacts for coastal communities all over the world. The Chrischtchurch City Council is required to have a 100-year planning horizon for sea level rise and this means planning for at least one meter, and possibly up to two meters, of sea level rise by 2115. This dissertation investigates the planning response to slow onset disasters, change, and uncertainty, using the example of sea-level rise in Christchurch, and it examines the role of public participation in this. To achieve this, the ways in which planning theory and practice acknowledge uncertainty, and cope with change, were critically analysed along with the Christchurch City Council’s response to the Tonkin and Taylor predictions and modelling. Semi-structured interviews with professionals in natural hazards risk reduction, policy, and planning were conducted, and the previous and proposed Christchurch City District Plans were compared. Planning for sea level rise in Christchurch provides an example of how planners may cope with slow onset change. The results of this dissertation suggests that the favoured risk reduction strategy for coastal communities in Christchurch is an adaptation strategy, and at present there is no sign of managed retreat being employed. The results also suggests using a planning approach that involves public participation for best results when planning for change, uncertainty or slow onset disasters.
A video of an address by Megan Veitch, University of Canterbury student, at the 2015 Seismics and the City forum. Ms. Veitch shares her aspirations for a renewed Christchurch and her goals for contributing to this.
A video of an address by Dr. Mark Quigley, Associate Professor of Active Tectonics and Geomorphology at the University of Canterbury. This talk was given at the 2015 Seismics and the City forum and addresses changes to the lie of the land - both physical and metaphorical.
A final year paper prepared by University of Canterbury students examining the positive effects of SCIRT on the New Zealand construction industry's health and safety performance.