Page 3 of Section A of the Christchurch Press, published on Monday 16 May 2011.
Page 3 of Section A of the Christchurch Press, published on Wednesday 9 July 2014.
Page 4 of Section A of the Christchurch edition of the Christchurch Press, published on Monday 9 May 2011.
A PDF copy of The Star newspaper, published on Friday 22 November 2013.
A video about the return of CTV to air after the 22 February 2011 earthquake.
Page 2 of The Box section of the Christchurch Press, published on Tuesday 26 April 2011.
Page 3 of Section C of the Christchurch Press, published on Saturday 25 January 2014.
Page 1 of Section A of the Christchurch Press, published on Tuesday 19 April 2011.
Page 4 of Section A of the South Island edition of the Christchurch Press, published on Monday 9 May 2011.
Page 12 of Section A of the Christchurch Press, published on Tuesday 19 April 2011.
Page 1 of Section A of the Christchurch Press, published on Tuesday 7 June 2011.
Page 8 of Section C of the Christchurch Press, published on Thursday 29 September 2011.
Page 20 of Section A of the Christchurch Press, published on Saturday 26 February 2011.
Page 15 of Section A of the Christchurch Press, published on Monday 4 April 2011.
Page 3 of The Box section of the Christchurch Press, published on Tuesday 13 December 2011.
Page 15 of Section C of the Christchurch Press, published on Saturday 19 March 2011.
Page 20 of Section C of the Christchurch Press, published on Saturday 24 September 2011.
Page 3 of Section A of the Christchurch Press, published on Thursday 7 April 2011.
Page 13 of Section A of the Christchurch Press, published on Saturday 7 May 2011.
Page 5 of Section A of the Christchurch Press, published on Tuesday 21 February 2012.
Page 4 of Section A of the Christchurch Press, published on Tuesday 3 May 2011.
Page 2 of Section C of the Christchurch Press, published on Saturday 25 January 2014.
Photograph captioned by Fairfax, "Earthquake damage in central Christchurch after a 6.3 earthquake. A businessman walks down the street with two computers in the minutes after Tuesday's quake".
Page 5 of Section A of the Christchurch Press, published on Wednesday 9 March 2011.
Batman is abroad in the night in 'Gotham City' and says 'Well we're all going batty down here!' Context: A reference to Christchurch, still struggling to recover from the earthquakes of 2010 and 2011. Quantity: 1 digital cartoon(s).
This thesis revisits the topic of earthquake recovery in Christchurch City more than a decade after the Canterbury earthquakes. Despite promising visions of a community reconnected and a sustainable and liveable city, significant portions of the city’s core – the Red Zone – remain dilapidated and “eerily empty”. At the same time, new developments in other areas have proven to be alienated or underutilised. Currently, the Canterbury Earthquake Recovery Authority’s plans for the rebuilding highlight the delivery of more residential housing to re-populate the city centre. However, prevalent approaches to housing development in Christchurch are ineffective for building an inclusive and active community. Hence, the central inquiry of the thesis is how the development of housing complexes can revitalise the Red Zone within the Christchurch city centre. The inquiry has been carried out through a research-through-design methodology, recognising the importance of an in-depth investigation that is contextualised and combined with the intuition and embodied knowledge of the designer. The investigation focuses on a neglected site in the Red Zone in the heart of Christchurch city, with significant Victorian and Edwardian Baroque heritage buildings, including Odeon Theatre, Lawrie & Wilson Auctioneers, and Sol Square, owned by The Regional Council Environment Canterbury. The design inquiry argues, develops, and is carried through a place-assemblage lens to housing development for city recovery, which recognizes the significance of socially responsive architecture that explores urban renewal by forging connections within the social network. Therefore, place-assemblage criteria and methods for developing socially active and meaningful housing developments are identified. Firstly, this thesis argues that co-living housing models are more focused on people relations and collective identity than the dominant developer-driven housing rebuilds, as they prioritise conduits for interaction and shared social meaning and practices. Secondly, the adaptive reuse of derelict heritage structures is proposed to reinvigorate the urban fabric, as heritage is seen to be conceived as and from a social assemblage of people. The design is realised by the principles outlined in the ICOMOS charter, which involves incorporating the material histories of existing structures and preserving the intangible heritage of the site by ensuring the continuity of cultural practices. Lastly, design processes and methods are also vital for place-sensitive results, which pay attention to the site’s unique characteristics to engage with local stakeholders and communities. The research explores place-assemblage methods of photographic extraction, the drawing of story maps, precedent studies, assemblage maps, bricolages, and paper models, which show an assembly of layers that piece together the existing heritage, social conduits, urban commons and housing to conceptualise the social network within its place.
Page 20 of Section O of the Christchurch Press, published on Wednesday 23 February 2011.
Page 2 of Section O of the Christchurch Press, published on Wednesday 23 February 2011.
Page 2 of Section A of the Christchurch Press, published on Thursday 24 February 2011.
Page 18 of Section O of the Christchurch Press, published on Wednesday 23 February 2011.