The operation of telecommunication networks is critical during business as usual times, and becomes most vital in post-disaster scenarios, when the services are most needed for restoring other critical lifelines, due to inherent interdependencies, and for supporting emergency and relief management tasks. In spite of the recognized critical importance, the assessment of the seismic performance for the telecommunication infrastructure appears to be underrepresented in the literature. The FP6 QuakeCoRE project “Performance of the Telecommunication Network during the Canterbury Earthquake Sequence” will provide a critical contribution to bridge this gap. Thanks to an unprecedented collaboration between national and international researchers and highly experienced asset managers from Chorus, data and evidences on the physical and functional performance of the telecommunication network after the Canterbury Earthquakes 2010-2011 have been collected and collated. The data will be processed and interpreted aiming to reveal fragilities and resilience of the telecommunication networks to seismic events
The 2010-2011 Canterbury earthquake sequence, and the resulting extensive data sets on damaged buildings that have been collected, provide a unique opportunity to exercise and evaluate previously published seismic performance assessment procedures. This poster provides an overview of the authors’ methodology to perform evaluations with two such assessment procedures, namely the P-58 guidelines and the REDi Rating System. P-58, produced by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) in the United States, aims to facilitate risk assessment and decision-making by quantifying earthquake ground shaking, structural demands, component damage and resulting consequences in a logical framework. The REDi framework, developed by the engineering firm ARUP, aids stakeholders in implementing resilience-based earthquake design. Preliminary results from the evaluations are presented. These have the potential to provide insights on the ability of the assessment procedures to predict impacts using “real-world” data. However, further work remains to critically analyse these results and to broaden the scope of buildings studied and of impacts predicted.
In response to the February 2011 earthquake, Parliament enacted the Canterbury Earthquake Recovery Act. This emergency legislation provided the executive with extreme powers that extended well beyond the initial emergency response and into the recovery phase. Although New Zealand has the Civil Defence Emergency Management Act 2002, it was unable to cope with the scale and intensity of the Canterbury earthquake sequence. Considering the well-known geological risk facing the Wellington region, this paper will consider whether a standalone “Disaster Recovery Act” should be established to separate an emergency and its response from the recovery phase. Currently, Government policy is to respond reactively to a disaster rather than proactively. In a major event, this typically involves the executive being given the ability to make rules, regulations and policy without the delay or oversight of normal legislative process. In the first part of this paper, I will canvas what a “Disaster Recovery Act” could prescribe and why there is a need to separate recovery from emergency. Secondly, I will consider the shortfalls in the current civil defence recovery framework which necessitates this kind of heavy governmental response after a disaster. In the final section, I will examine how
This report contributes to a collaborative project between the Marlborough District Council (MDC) and University of Canterbury (UC) which aims to help protect and promote the recovery of native dune systems on the Marlborough coast. It is centred around the mapping of dune vegetation and identification of dune protection zones for old-growth seed sources of the native sand-binders spinifex (Spinifex sericeus) and pīngao (Ficinia spiralis). Both are key habitat-formers associated with nationally threatened dune ecosystems, and pīngao is an important weaving resource and Ngāi Tahu taonga species. The primary goal is to protect existing seed sources that are vital for natural regeneration following major disturbances such as the earthquake event. Several additional protection zones are also identified for areas where new dunes are successfully regenerating, including areas being actively restored in the Beach Aid project that is assisting new native dunes to become established where there is available space.
Welcome to the Recover newsletter Issue 6 from the Marine Ecology Research Group (MERG) of the University of Canterbury. Recover is designed to keep you updated on our MBIE-funded earthquake recovery project called RECOVER (Reef Ecology, Coastal Values & Earthquake Recovery). This 6th instalment features the ‘new land’ created by the earthquake uplift of the coastline, recreational uses of beaches in Marlborough, and pāua survey work and hatchery projects with our partners in Kaikōura.
Disclosure CEO expenses
Post February 22 Earthquake Damage PWS-2011-03-09-DSC9923
Post February 22 Earthquake Damage PWS-2011-03-09-DSC9952
Post February 22 Earthquake Damage Corner Opawa Road and Aynsley Terrace, Opawa PWS-2011-03-09-DSC9942
Post February 22 Earthquake Damage PWS-2011-03-09-DSC9950
Post February 22 Earthquake Damage Corner Opawa Road and Aynsley Terrace, Opawa PWS-2011-03-09-DSC9938
Post February 22 Earthquake Damage Corner Opawa Road and Aynsley Terrace, Opawa PWS-2011-03-09-DSC9940
Post February 22 Earthquake Damage PWS-2011-03-09-DSC9929
Post February 22 Earthquake Damage PWS-2011-03-09-DSC9927
Post February 22 Earthquake Damage Corner Opawa Road and Aynsley Terrace, Opawa PWS-2011-03-09-DSC9935
Post February 22 Earthquake Damage PWS-2011-03-09-DSC9956
Post February 22 Earthquake Damage Corner Opawa Road and Aynsley Terrace, Opawa PWS-2011-03-09-DSC9941
Post February 22 Earthquake Damage Corner Opawa Road and Aynsley Terrace, Opawa PWS-2011-03-09-DSC9948
Post February 22 Earthquake Damage Corner Opawa Road and Aynsley Terrace, Opawa PWS-2011-03-09-DSC9944
Post February 22 Earthquake Damage PWS-2011-03-09-DSC9934
Post February 22 Earthquake Damage PWS-2011-03-09-DSC9922
Post February 22 Earthquake Damage PWS-2011-03-09-DSC9953
Post February 22 Earthquake Damage PWS-2011-03-09-DSC9955
Post February 22 Earthquake Damage PWS-2011-03-09-DSC9931
Post February 22 Earthquake Damage PWS-2011-03-09-DSC9928
Post February 22 Earthquake Damage PWS-2011-03-09-DSC9954
Post February 22 Earthquake Damage Corner Opawa Road and Aynsley Terrace, Opawa PWS-2011-03-09-DSC9947
Post February 22 Earthquake Damage PWS-2011-03-09-DSC9930
Post February 22 Earthquake Damage PWS-2011-03-09-DSC9925
Post February 22 Earthquake Damage PWS-2011-03-09-DSC9951