A PDF copy of the North Canterbury News community newspaper, published on Tuesday 7 September 2010.
A PDF copy of the Selwyn Times community newspaper, published on Tuesday 14 September 2010.
A PDF copy of The Star newspaper, published on Wednesday 30 March 2011.
Page 13 of Section A of the Christchurch Press, published on Friday 11 March 2011.
Page 9 of Section A of the Christchurch Press, published on Saturday 19 March 2011.
Page 15 of Section A of the Christchurch Press, published on Saturday 19 March 2011.
Page 27 of Section A of the Christchurch Press, published on Wednesday 16 March 2011.
Page 12 of Section A of the Christchurch Press, published on Monday 21 March 2011.
Page 3 of Section A of the Christchurch Press, published on Monday 18 April 2011.
Page 22 of Section A of the Christchurch Press, published on Saturday 26 March 2011.
A PDF copy of the Selwyn Times community newspaper, published on Tuesday 7 September 2010.
Page 12 of Section A of the Christchurch Press, published on Tuesday 29 March 2011.
Page 17 of Section A of the Christchurch Press, published on Monday 7 March 2011.
Page 6 of Section A of the Christchurch Press, published on Monday 14 March 2011.
Page 9 of Section A of the Christchurch Press, published on Saturday 18 June 2011.
A PDF copy of The Star newspaper, published on Wednesday 22 June 2011.
Page 15 of Section A of the Christchurch Press, published on Thursday 21 April 2011.
Page 7 of Section A of the Christchurch edition of the Christchurch Press, published on Thursday 26 May 2011.
Page 7 of Section A of the Christchurch Press, published on Wednesday 15 June 2011.
Page 18 of Section A of the Christchurch Press, published on Friday 17 June 2011.
Page 21 of Section A of the Christchurch Press, published on Saturday 18 June 2011.
Page 18 of Section A of the Christchurch Press, published on Wednesday 6 April 2011.
An entry from Ruth Gardner's blog for 18 June 2011 entitled, "Confidence Cracking".
Page 11 of Section A of the Christchurch Press, published on Tuesday 21 June 2011.
Page 4 of Section A of the Christchurch Press, published on Tuesday 21 June 2011.
Page 22 of Section A of the Christchurch Press, published on Saturday 2 April 2011.
Page 2 of Section A of the Christchurch Press, published on Monday 20 June 2011.
Geomorphic, structural and chronological data are used to establish the late Quaternary paleoseismicity of the active dextral-oblique Northern Esk Fault in North Canterbury, New Zealand. Detailed field mapping of the preserved c. 35 km of surface traces between the Hurunui River and Ashley Head reveals variations in strike ranging from 005° to 057°. Along with kinematic data collected from fault plane striae and offset geomorphic markers along the length of the fault these variations are used to distinguish six structural subsections of the main trace, four dextral-reverse and two dextral-normal. Displacements of geomorphic markers such as minor streams and ridges are measured using differential GPS and rangefinder equipment to reveal lateral offsets ranging from 3.4 to 23.7 m and vertical offsets ranging from < 1 to 13.5 m. Characteristic single event displacements of c. 5 m and c. 2 m have been calculated for strike-slip and reverse sections respectively. The use of fault scaling relationships reveals an anomalously high displacement to surface rupture length ratio when compared to global data sets. Fault scaling relationships based on width limited ruptures and magnitude probabilities from point measurements of displacement imply earthquake magnitudes of Mw 7.0 to 7.5. Optically Stimulated Luminescence (OSL) ages from displaced Holocene alluvial terraces at the northern extent of the active trace along with OSL and radiocarbon samples of the central sections constrain the timing of the last two surface rupturing events (11.15 ±1.65 and 3.5 ± 2.8 ka) and suggest a recurrence interval of c. 5612 ± 445 years and late Quaternary reverse and dextral slip rates of c. 0.31 mm/yr and 0.82 mm/yr respectively. The results of this study show that the Northern Esk Fault accommodates an important component of the c. 0.7 – 2 mm/yr of unresolved strain across the plate boundary within the North Canterbury region and affirm the Esk Fault as a source of potentially damaging ground shaking in the Canterbury region.
The timeliness and quality of recovery activities are impacted by the organisation and human resourcing of the physical works. This research addresses the suitability of different resourcing strategies on post-disaster demolition and debris management programmes. This qualitative analysis primarily draws on five international case studies including 2010 Canterbury earthquake, 2009 L’Aquila earthquake, 2009 Samoan Tsunami, 2009 Victorian Bushfires and 2005 Hurricane Katrina. The implementation strategies are divided into two categories: collectively and individually facilitated works. The impacts of the implementation strategies chosen are assessed for all disaster waste management activities including demolition, waste collection, transportation, treatment and waste disposal. The impacts assessed include: timeliness, completeness of projects; and environmental, economic and social impacts. Generally, the case studies demonstrate that detritus waste removal and debris from major repair work is managed at an individual property level. Debris collection, demolition and disposal are generally and most effectively carried out as a collective activity. However, implementation strategies are affected by contextual factors (such as funding and legal constraints) and the nature of the disaster waste (degree of hazardous waste, geographical spread of waste etc.) and need to be designed accordingly. Community involvement in recovery activities such as demolition and debris removal is shown to contribute positively to psychosocial recovery.
Disaster recovery is significantly affected by funding availability. The timeliness and quality of recovery activities are not only impacted by the extent of the funding but also the mechanisms with which funding is prioritised, allocated and delivered. This research addresses the impact of funding mechanisms on the effectiveness and efficiency of post-disaster demolition and debris management programmes. A qualitative assessment of the impacts on recovery of different funding sources and mechanisms was carried out, using the 2010 Canterbury Earthquake as well as other recent international events as case studies. The impacts assessed include: timeliness, completeness, environmental, economic and social impacts. Of the case studies investigated, the Canterbury Earthquake was the only disaster response to rely solely on a privatised approach to insurance for debris management. Due to the low level of resident displacement and low level of hazard in the waste, this was a satisfactory approach, though not ideal. This approach has led to greater organisational complexity and delays. For many other events, the potential community wide impacts caused by the prolonged presence of disaster debris means that publicly funded and centrally facilitated programmes appear to be the most common and effective method of managing disaster waste.