Page 3 of Section A of the Christchurch Press, published on Friday 22 February 2013.
Page 5 of Section A of the Christchurch Press, published on Thursday 18 July 2013.
Page 7 of Section A of the Christchurch Press, published on Friday 13 December 2013.
Page 7 of Section A of the Christchurch Press, published on Monday 3 September 2012.
Page 6 of Section A of the Christchurch Press, published on Thursday 23 February 2012.
Page 1 of Section C of the Christchurch Press, published on Saturday 1 March 2014.
Page 3 of Section A of the Christchurch Press, published on Thursday 28 August 2014.
Page 1 of Section A of the Christchurch Press, published on Tuesday 26 August 2014.
Page 5 of Section A of the Christchurch Press, published on Monday 20 February 2012.
Page 3 of Section C of the Christchurch Press, published on Saturday 1 March 2014.
A video of a tour of the Christchurch central city Red Zone. The video shows footage of the Edmond's Band Rotunda, Gloucester Street, the CTV building site, Poplar Lane, the McKenzie & Willis building, High Street, Lichfield Street, Colombo Street, Cathedral Square, and ChristChurch Cathedral.
Page 2 of Section A of the Christchurch Press, published on Wednesday 12 March 2014.
Page 1 of Section A of the Christchurch Press, published on Monday 12 August 2013.
Page 1 of Section A of the Christchurch Press, published on Tuesday 15 July 2014.
Page 5 of Section A of the Christchurch Press, published on Friday 5 September 2014.
Page 4 of Section A of the Christchurch Press, published on Friday 7 November 2014.
Page 4 of Section A of the Christchurch Press, published on Friday 5 December 2014.
Page 4 of Section A of the Christchurch Press, published on Wednesday 18 July 2012.
Page 2 of Section A of the Christchurch Press, published on Friday 3 August 2012.
Page 7 of Section A of the Christchurch Press, published on Wednesday 8 August 2012.
Page 3 of Section A of the Christchurch Press, published on Thursday 6 September 2012.
Page 5 of Section A of the Christchurch Press, published on Wednesday 27 March 2013.
Page 1 of Section A of the Christchurch Press, published on Thursday 9 January 2014.
Page 3 of Section A of the Christchurch Press, published on Tuesday 17 July 2012.
Page 1 of Section A of the Christchurch Press, published on Thursday 18 September 2014.
Page 4 of Section A of the Christchurch Press, published on Friday 15 November 2013.
Page 6 of Section A of the Christchurch Press, published on Thursday 26 March 2015.
The seismic performance of soil profiles with potentially liquefiable deposits is a complex phenomenon that requires a thorough understanding of the soil properties and ground motion characteristics. The limitations of simplified liquefaction assessment methods have prompted an increase in the use of non-linear dynamic analysis methods. Focusing on onedimensional site response of a soil column, this thesis validated a soil constitutive model using in-situ pore pressure measurements and then assessed the influence of input ground motion characteristics on soil column response using traditional and newly developed metrics. Pore pressure recordings during the Canterbury Earthquake Sequence (CES) in New Zealand were used to validate the PM4Sand constitutive model. Soil profile characterization was key to accurate prediction of excess pore pressure response and accounting for any densification during the CES. Response during multiple earthquakes was captured effectively and cross-layer interaction demonstrated the model capability to capture soil response at the system-level. Synthetic and observed ground motions from the Christchurch earthquake were applied to the validated soil column to quantify the performance of synthetic motions. New metrics were developed to facilitate a robust comparison to assess performance. The synthetic input motions demonstrated a slightly larger acceleration and excess pore pressure response compared to the observed input motions. The results suggest that the synthetic motions may accumulate higher excess pore pressure at a faster rate and with fewer number of cycles in the shear response. This research compares validated soil profile subject to spectrally-matched pulse and non-pulse motions, emphasizing the inclusion of pulse motions with distinctive characteristics in ground motion suites for non-linear dynamic analysis. However, spectral matching may lead to undesired alterations in pulse characteristics. Cumulative absolute velocity and significant duration significantly differed between these two groups compared to the other key characteristics and contributed considerably to the liquefaction response. Unlike the non-pulse motions, not all of the pulse motions triggered liquefaction, likely due to their shorter significant duration. Non-pulse motions developed a greater spatial extent of liquefaction triggering in the soil profile and extended to a greater depth.
A video of Press journalist Martin Van Beynen talking about the Canterbury Television Building which collapsed during the 22 February 2011 earthquake. Beynen investigates the construction manager of the building, Gerald Shirtcliff, who allegedly faked an engineering degree and stole the identity of an engineer he knew in South Africa. The video also includes footage of Shirtcliff giving evidence about the CTV Building at the Canterbury Earthquake Royal Commission.
Page 5 of Section A of the Christchurch Press, published on Wednesday 28 November 2012.