Supplemental energy dissipation devices are increasingly used to protect structures, limit loads transferred to structural elements and absorbing significant response energy without sacrificial structural damage. Lead extrusion dampers are supplemental energy dissipation devices, where recent development of smaller volumetric size with high force capacities, called high force to volume (HF2V) devices, has seen deployment in a large series of scaled and full-scaled experiments, as well as in three new structures in Christchurch, NZ and San Francisco, USA. HF2V devices have previously been designed using limited precision models, so there is variation in force prediction capability. Further, while the overall resistive force is predicted, the knowledge of the relative contributions of the different internal reaction mechanisms to these overall resistive forces is lacking, limiting insight and predictive accuracy in device design. There is thus a major need for detailed design models to better understand force generation, and to aid precision device design. These outcomes would speed the overall design and implementation process for uptake and use, reducing the need for iterative experimental testing. Design parameters from 17 experimental HF2V device tests are used to create finite element models using ABAQUS. The analysis is run using ABAQUS Explicit, in multiple step times of 1 second with automatic increments, to balance higher accuracy and computational time. The output is obtained from the time- history output of the contact pressure forces including the normal and friction forces on the lead along the shaft. These values are used to calculate the resistive force on the shaft as it moves through the lead, and thus the device force. Results of these highly nonlinear, high strain analyses are compared to experimental device force results. Model errors compared to experimental results for all 17 devices ranged from 0% to 20% with a mean absolute error of 6.4%, indicating most errors were small. In particular, the standard error in manufacturing is SE = ±14%. In this case, 15 of 17 devices (88%) are within ±1SE (±14%) and 2 of 17 devices (12%) are within ±2SE (±28). These results show low errors and a distribution of errors compared to experimental results that are within experimental device construction variability. The overall modelling methodology is objective and repeatable, and thus generalizable. The exact same modelling approach is applied to all devices with only the device geometry changing. The results validate the overall approach with relatively low error, providing a general modelling methodology for accurate design of HF2V devices.
Recent seismic events, such as the 2010-2011 Canterbury earthquakes and the 2016 Kaikōura earthquakes, have shed light on issues with the seismic performance of glazing systems. This is attributed to the limited amount of research and consideration of glazing systems in design and assessments. Previous research and evidence from post-earthquake reconnaissance have shown that glazing systems pose a hazard due to falling glass. As such, it is vital to ensure that glazing systems are designed with the necessary levels of seismic performance. Furthermore, the post-earthquake repair of glass facades can be costly and time-consuming. Some previous research has been conducted to highlight the seismic performance and fragility of glazing systems. However, most prior research only focussed on life-safety issues of glazing systems and rarely on the serviceability of glazing systems. The serviceability of glazing systems, such as water-tightness, is a vital aspect of glazing systems as a low serviceability capacity will increase the likelihood of further damage which will increase economic losses. This is the aim of this research, to provide insight towards the seismic performance of glazing systems considering both the serviceability and ultimate limit state by generating insight into the behaviour of glazing systems and developing tools for the consideration of glazing systems in design and assessment. This will allow a value proposition for seismic detailing of glazing to be evaluated. In order to provide insight into the behaviour of glazing systems and a means for evaluating their seismic performance, this research firstly develops an applicable experimental testing procedure that allows for serviceability limit state tests on glazing units. This experimental testing procedure is used to obtain data on the vulnerability of general New Zealand glazing systems’ performance, specifically unitised glazing systems that are commonly used as commercial shopfront glazing system types. These glazing systems typically realised using aluminium framing with gaskets connecting the frame to the glass. After the experimental testing, numerical analyses calibrated to the experimental testing results are conducted to enable robust analyses of glazing systems’ fragility. Finally, a value proposition for glazing systems with seismic detailing is made by comparing the performance of glazing systems with seismic detailing and conventional glazing systems. This comparison is done using the PEER-PBEE method and the economic implications of each glazing system is shown. Suggestions for designers and stakeholders aimed at reducing costs related to the seismic performance of glazing systems is also shown. Using the novel experimental method developed in this research, three different full-scale glazing systems were tested. A total of 10 unitised glazing specimens were tested; three with standard detailing, three with seismic detailing and four that were structurally glazed. These tests evaluated three damage states (DS): loss of water-tightness (DS1), gasket damage (DS2), and glass or framing failure (DS3). The experimental method that was adopted is considered to be more desirable than the optional procedures set out in New Zealand glazing standards. The method does not require high-speed testing equipment and is easy to replicate by the industry. The test results show that water-tightness was lost at low drift levels, with the first leakage occurring at just 0.15% drift for one specimen, while a standard glazing system had a median drift capacity of 0.35%. In contrast, seismic glazing systems detailed to better accommodate in-plane movements, demonstrated a significantly higher median drift capacity of 1.88%. The numerical approach proposed in this research has shown that it is possible to numerically model the glazing-gasket interaction to conservatively predict the water-leakage drift (damage state 1). The modelling approach still needs further development if it were to be used for damage states DS2 and DS3. The last part of the research considered the value proposition for seismic glazing systems. This was achieved by applying the FEMA P-58 performance assessment framework to a number of case study buldings that are typical of New Zealand design. The results suggest that it may not be economically worthwhile to use well-detailed seismic glazing systems despite the considerably larger drift capacity they possess relative to standard systems. However, as the cost of seismic glazing systems reduces, and more information on repair costs for different damage states is obtained, the value proposition may change.
