CanCERN Newsletter 75, 8 March 2013
Articles, UC QuakeStudies
A copy of the CanCERN online newsletter published on 8 March 2013
A copy of the CanCERN online newsletter published on 8 March 2013
A copy of the CanCERN online newsletter published on 21 June 2013
An entry from Ruth Gardner's Blog for 20 June 2014 entitled, "Doctor's Discussion".
Transcript of Jan Dobson's earthquake story, captured by the UC QuakeBox project.
The "Lyttelton Review" newsletter for 12 March 2012, produced by the Lyttelton Harbour Information Centre.
A video of a presentation by Dr Scott Miles during the Community Resilience Stream of the 2016 People in Disasters Conference. The presentation is titled, "A Community Wellbeing Centric Approach to Disaster Resilience".The abstract for this presentation reads as follows: A higher bar for advancing community disaster resilience can be set by conducting research and developing capacity-building initiatives that are based on understanding and monitoring community wellbeing. This presentation jumps off from this view, arguing that wellbeing is the most important concept for improving the disaster resilience of communities. The presentation uses examples from the 2010 and 2011 Canterbury earthquakes to illustrate the need and effectiveness of a wellbeing-centric approach. While wellbeing has been integrated in the Canterbury recovery process, community wellbeing and resilience need to guide research and planning. The presentation unpacks wellbeing in order to synthesize it with other concepts that are relevant to community disaster resilience. Conceptualizing wellbeing as either the opportunity for or achievement of affiliation, autonomy, health, material needs, satisfaction, and security is common and relatively accepted across non-disaster fields. These six variables can be systematically linked to fundamental elements of resilience. The wellbeing variables are subject to potential loss, recovery, and adaptation based on the empirically established ties to community identity, such as sense of place. Variables of community identity are what translate the disruption, damage, restoration, reconstruction, and reconfiguration of a community's different critical services and capital resources to different states of wellbeing across a community that has been impacted by a hazard event. With reference to empirical research and the Canterbury case study, the presentation integrates these insights into a robust framework to facilitate meeting the challenge of raising the standard of community disaster resilience research and capacity building through development of wellbeing-centric approaches.
Summary of oral history interview with Kirsty about her experiences of the Canterbury earthquakes.
An entry from Jennifer Middendorf's blog for 31 May 2013 entitled, "1000 days".
A copy of the CanCERN online newsletter published on 1 June 2012
An entry from Deb Robertson's blog for 25 December 2011 entitled, "Merry Christmas....".
An entry from Ruth Gardner's blog for 21 December 2011 entitled, "Summer Solstice".
Transcript of Lou's earthquake story, captured by the UC QuakeBox project.
A story submitted by Trent Hiles to the QuakeStories website.
Summary of oral history interview with Netta about her experiences of the Canterbury earthquakes.
A story submitted by Jenny Garing to the QuakeStories website.
A story submitted by Scott Thomas to the QuakeStories website.
A story submitted by Anonymous to the QuakeStories website.
A video of a presentation by Richard Conlin during the Community Resilience Stream of the 2016 People in Disasters Conference. The presentation is titled, "Resilience, Poverty, and Seismic Culture".The abstract for this presentation reads as follows: A strategy of resilience is built around the recognition that effective emergency response requires community involvement and mobilization. It further recognizes that many of the characteristics that equip communities to respond most effectively to short term emergencies are also characteristics that build strong communities over the long term. Building resilient communities means integrating our approaches to poverty, community engagement, economic development, and housing into a coherent strategy that empowers community members to engage with each other and with other communities. In this way, resilience becomes a complementary concept to sustainability. This requires an asset-based change strategy where external agencies meet communities where they are, in their own space, and use collective impact approaches to work in partnership. This also requires understanding and assessing poverty, including physical, financial, and social capital in their myriad manifestations. Poverty is not exclusively a matter of class. It is a complex subject, and different communities manifest multiple versions of poverty, which must be respected and understood through the asset-based lens. Resilience is a quality of a community and a system, and develops over time as a result of careful analysis of strengths and vulnerabilities and taking actions to increase competencies and reduce risk situations. Resilience requires maintenance and must be developed in a way that includes practicing continuous improvement and adaptation. The characteristics of a resilient community include both physical qualities and 'soft infrastructure', such as community knowledge, resourcefulness, and overall health. This presentation reviews the experience of some earlier disasters, outlines a working model of how emergency response, resilience, and poverty interact and can be addressed in concert, and concludes with a summary of what the 2010 Chilean earthquake tells us about how a 'seismic culture' can function effectively in communities even when government suffers from unexpected shortcomings.
Summary of oral history interview with Amber Henderson about her experiences of the Canterbury earthquakes.
An entry from Jennifer Middendorf's blog for 31 December 2011 entitled, "2011 in review".
An entry from Jennifer Middendorf's blog for 9 October 2010 entitled, "Dreaming of America".
A pdf transcript of Sara Green's second earthquake story, captured by the UC QuakeBox Take 2 project. Interviewer: Laura Moir. Transcriber: Sarah Woodfield.
An entry from Deb Robertson's blog for 3 September 2012 entitled, "There's a lot you can learn in two years....".
An entry from Deb Robertson's blog for 15 October 2011 entitled, "Le Race 2011".
Summary of oral history interview with Mary Hobbs about her experiences of the Canterbury earthquakes.
A story submitted by Serra Kilduff to the QuakeStories website.
An entry from Roz Johnson's blog for 2 August 2011 entitled, "New Light".
Summary of oral history interview with Genevieve Togiaso about her experiences of the Canterbury earthquakes.
Summary of oral history interview with Katherine Ewer about her experiences of the Canterbury earthquakes.
Transcript of Robyn Anderson's earthquake story, captured by the UC QuakeBox project.