QuakeStory 760
Articles, UC QuakeStudies
A story submitted by David Hopkins to the QuakeStories website.
A story submitted by David Hopkins to the QuakeStories website.
A story submitted by Ben Hullen to the QuakeStories website.
A story submitted by Kathy to the QuakeStories website.
A story submitted by Anonymous to the QuakeStories website.
A story submitted by Jo Wicken to the QuakeStories website.
A story submitted by Ricki hinch to the QuakeStories website.
A story submitted by Jo Wicken to the QuakeStories website.
A story submitted by Jo Wicken to the QuakeStories website.
An entry from Deb Robertson's blog for 19 February 2016 entitled, "Five Years".The entry was downloaded on 2 November 2016.
A story submitted by Chris martin to the QuakeStories website.
A story submitted by J. C. to the QuakeStories website.
A story submitted by Archie Thomson to the QuakeStories website.
A video of a presentation by Dr Scott Miles during the Community Resilience Stream of the 2016 People in Disasters Conference. The presentation is titled, "A Community Wellbeing Centric Approach to Disaster Resilience".The abstract for this presentation reads as follows: A higher bar for advancing community disaster resilience can be set by conducting research and developing capacity-building initiatives that are based on understanding and monitoring community wellbeing. This presentation jumps off from this view, arguing that wellbeing is the most important concept for improving the disaster resilience of communities. The presentation uses examples from the 2010 and 2011 Canterbury earthquakes to illustrate the need and effectiveness of a wellbeing-centric approach. While wellbeing has been integrated in the Canterbury recovery process, community wellbeing and resilience need to guide research and planning. The presentation unpacks wellbeing in order to synthesize it with other concepts that are relevant to community disaster resilience. Conceptualizing wellbeing as either the opportunity for or achievement of affiliation, autonomy, health, material needs, satisfaction, and security is common and relatively accepted across non-disaster fields. These six variables can be systematically linked to fundamental elements of resilience. The wellbeing variables are subject to potential loss, recovery, and adaptation based on the empirically established ties to community identity, such as sense of place. Variables of community identity are what translate the disruption, damage, restoration, reconstruction, and reconfiguration of a community's different critical services and capital resources to different states of wellbeing across a community that has been impacted by a hazard event. With reference to empirical research and the Canterbury case study, the presentation integrates these insights into a robust framework to facilitate meeting the challenge of raising the standard of community disaster resilience research and capacity building through development of wellbeing-centric approaches.