Unreinforced masonry (URM) buildings have repeatedly been shown to perform poorly in large magnitude earthquakes, with both New Zealand and Australia having a history of past earthquakes that have resulted in fatalities due to collapsed URM buildings. A comparison is presented here of the URM building stock and the seismic vulnerability of Christchurch and Adelaide in order to demonstrate the relevance to Australian cities of observations in Christchurch resulting from the 2010/2011 Canterbury earthquake swarm. It is shown that the materials, architecture and hence earthquake strength of URM buildings in both countries is comparable and that Adelaide and other cities of Australia have seismic vulnerability sufficient to cause major damage to their URM buildings should a design level earthquake occur. Such an earthquake is expected to cause major building damage, and fatalities should be expected.
In 2013 Becca Wood, Spatial Performance Practitioner, and Molly Mullen, Applied Theatre Practitioner, collaborated to create a short ambulatory performance with audio score for a group of drama educators attending a conference workshop on the possibilities of walking as performance. The performance was created remotely from the intended site: Rangi Ruru Girls’ School, in Christchurch, New Zealand. Following the destruction of the 2012 earthquake, this site was in a state of transformation and recovery. The performance walk attended to the histories, geographies and politics of this place, somatically, architecturally and socially. This paper engages with three critical questions: How might mediated listening and walking activate the coming together of bodies and place? What performative shifts occurred for the participants in the walk and workshop? How might we come to our senses? Through a performative practice of mediated site-based listening and walking, this paper is a reflection on the creative process and performance. We consider the potential for technologically mediated performance to offer new modes for learning and creative practice through interdisciplinary and evolving intermedial practices. http://www.tandfonline.com/toc/crde20/current AM - Accepted Manuscript
The quality of multi-owned residential buildings and the capability to maintain that quality into the future is important in preserving not only the monetary value of such housing (Lujanen, 2010) but also the quality of life for its residents. The aim of this paper is to examine the governance and decision-making rules and regulations as they relate to the undertaking of major repairs in multi-owned residential buildings in Finland and New Zealand with particular regard to the Finnish Limited Liability Housing Companies Act 2010 (LLHCA 2010) and the New Zealand Unit Titles Act 2010 (UTA 2010). Currently, major building repairs are topical issues in both countries; in Finland as a result of ageing buildings requiring major re-fitting of pipes and other infrastructure, and in New Zealand as a result of earthquake damage in Christchurch and Leaky Building Syndrome nationwide. Major repairs can be a significant financial burden to unit owners and collective decisions can be difficult to achieve. Interestingly, new legislation that governs multi-owned housing was enacted in both countries in 2010. The recent enactment of this legislation provides an opportunity to examine the UTA 2010 and LLHCA 2010 with regard to how they address major repairs, improvements in housing stock and the financing possibilities associated with these undertakings. More specifically this paper explores housing intensification (i.e. building up, out or alongside existing multi-owned residential buildings on commonly owned land) as a means of financing major repairs. The comparison of governance and decision-making in two different shared ownership systems with different histories and cultural contexts provides a chance to explore the possibilities and challenges that each country faces, and the potential to learn from each other’s practices and develop these further. In this regard the findings from this paper contribute to the academic literature (Bugden 2005; Easthope & Randolph 2009; Dupuis & Dixon 2010; Lujanen 2010; Easthope, Hudson & Randolph 2013) concerning to the governance of multi-owned housing as it relates to intensive housing development and its wider social and economic implications.
The increasing prevalence of mixed-material buildings that combine concrete walls and steel frames in New Zealand, coupled with a lack of specific design and detailing guidelines for concrete wall-steel beam connections, underscores the need for comprehensive research to ensure that these structures behave as intended during earthquakes. Bolted web plate connections, commonly found in steel framing systems, are typically used to connect steel beams to concrete walls. These connections are idealised as pinned during design. However, research on steel framing systems has shown that these connections can develop significant stiffness and moment resistance when subjected to large rotations during seismic loading, potentially leading to brittle failure when used in concrete wall to steel beam applications. This thesis was written to understand the seismic performance of concrete wall-steel beam bolted web plate connections, providing experimental evidence, numerical modelling insights, and design recommendations to address critical gaps in current design practices. The study is divided into three phases. First, a review of 50 concrete wall-steel frame buildings in Auckland and Christchurch was conducted to understand current design practices and typical connection details. The findings revealed significant variation in design and detailing practices and a lack of specific guidelines for concrete wall-steel beam connections. Second, an experimental programme was conducted on four full-scale concrete wall-steel beam sub-assemblages, each incorporating variations in connection detailing. The tests were designed to quantify the rotation capacity of concrete wall-steel beam connections, identify failure modes and investigate the effectiveness of potential connection improvements. Results demonstrated that concrete wall-steel beam bolted web plate connections designed using current design standards and following existing practices are vulnerable to non-ductile failure characterised by concrete breakout. However, using slotted holes in the web plate and bent reinforcing bar anchors instead of headed stud anchors improved connection rotation capacity. Third, a numerical model of a case study building was developed on OpenSeesPy, with different connection conditions assumed based on the experimental results. Pushover and time history analyses were conducted to evaluate the implications of different connection conditions (pinned vs non-pinned) on global building response and local member demands. The findings revealed that using non-pinned connection conditions does not significantly affect the global building response and shear and bending moment demands on lateral load-resisting elements. However, doing so generates overstrength moments on the connections that induce different actions on out-of-plane concrete walls connected to steel beams. Synthesising findings from all three phases, this thesis concludes with a proposed design procedure for concrete wall-steel beam connections based on a capacity design approach to ensure ductile failure modes and suppress brittle ones. Key recommendations include selecting appropriate bolt hole geometry and anchorage, providing sufficient rotation capacity, and accounting for connection overstrength in global analyses.
